Health-Related Quality of Life in Athletes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
- 1 June 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Journal of Athletic Training/NATA in Journal of Athletic Training
- Vol. 51 (6), 442-453
- https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-51.7.03
Abstract
Context: Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after injury is important. Differences in HRQOL between nonathletes and athletes and between injured and uninjured athletes have been demonstrated; however, the evidence has not been synthesized. Objective: To answer the following questions: (1) Does HRQOL differ among adolescent and collegiate athletes and nonathletes? (2) Does HRQOL differ between injured adolescent and collegiate athletes or between athletes with a history of injury and uninjured athletes or those without a history of injury? Data Sources: We systematically searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and PubMed. A hand search of references was also conducted. Study Selection: Studies were included if they used generic instruments to compare HRQOL outcomes between athletes and nonathletes and between uninjured and injured athletes. Studies were excluded if they did not use a generic instrument, pertained to instrument development, or included retired athletes or athletes with a chronic disease. Data Extraction: We assessed study quality using the modified Downs and Black Index Tool. Bias-corrected Hedges g effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) was used to determine the overall strength of the recommendation. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for all studies using the composite or total score. Data Synthesis: Eight studies with modified Downs and Black scores ranging from 70.6% to 88.4% were included. For question 1, the overall random-effects meta-analysis was weak (effect size = 0.27, 95% confidence interval = 0.14, 0.40; P < .001). For question 2, the overall random-effects meta-analysis was moderate (effect size = 0.68, 95% confidence interval = 0.42, 0.95; P < .001). Conclusions: Grade A evidence indicates that athletes reported better HRQOL than nonathletes and that uninjured athletes reported better HRQOL than injured athletes. However, the overall effect for question 1 was weak, suggesting that the differences between athletes and nonathletes may not be clinically meaningful. Clinicians should monitor HRQOL after injury to ensure that all dimensions of health are appropriately treated.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Self-Reported History of Concussion Affects Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescent AthletesAthletic Training & Sports Health Care, 2010
- Impact of Prior Concussions on Health-Related Quality of Life in Collegiate AthletesClinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2010
- Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youthInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2010
- Recent Injury and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescent AthletesJournal of Athletic Training, 2009
- Using Disablement Models and Clinical Outcomes Assessment to Enable Evidence-Based Athletic Training Practice, Part II: Clinical Outcomes AssessmentJournal of Athletic Training, 2008
- Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Presidential Address of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports MedicineThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1994
- Evidence for the Validity of the Short-form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) in an Elderly PopulationAge and Ageing, 1994
- Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sampleQuality of Life Research, 1994
- Generic and Disease-Specific Measures in Assessing Health Status and Quality of LifeMedical Care, 1989