Implication of New WHO Growth Standards on Identification of Risk Factors and Estimated Prevalence of Malnutrition in Rural Malawian Infants
Open Access
- 16 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 3 (7), e2684
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002684
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) released new Child Growth Standards in 2006 to replace the current National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) growth reference. We assessed how switching from the NCHS to the newly released WHO Growth Standards affects the estimated prevalence of wasting, underweight and stunting, and the pattern of risk factors identified. Data were drawn from a village-informant driven Demographic Surveillance System in Northern Malawi. Children (n = 1328) were visited twice at 0–4 months and 11–15 months. Data were collected on the demographic and socio-economic environment of the child, health history, maternal and child anthropometry and child feeding practices. Weight-for-length, weight-for-age and length-for-age were derived in z-scores using the two growth references. In early infancy, prevalence estimates were 2.9, 6.1, and 8.5 fold higher for stunting, underweight, and wasting respectively using the WHO standards compared to NCHS reference (p<0.001 for all). At one year, prevalence estimates for wasting and stunting did not differ significantly according to reference used, but the prevalence of underweight was half that with the NCHS reference (p<0.001). Patterns of risk factors were similar with the two growth references for all outcomes at one year although the strength of association was higher with WHO standards. Differences in prevalence estimates differed in magnitude but not direction from previous studies. The scale of these differences depends on the population's nutritional status thus it should not be assumed a priori. The increase in estimated prevalence of wasting in early infancy has implications for feeding programs targeting lactating mothers and ante-natal multiple micronutrients supplementation to tackle small birth size. Risk factors identified using WHO standards remain comparable with findings based on the NCHS reference in similar settings. Further research should aim to identify whether the young infants additionally diagnosed as malnourished by this new standard are more appropriate targets for interventions than those identified with the NCHS reference.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of a village-informant driven demographic surveillance system in Karonga, Northern MalawiDemographic Research, 2007
- Operational implications of using 2006 World Health Organization growth standards in nutrition programmes: secondary data analysisBMJ, 2007
- Field-Testing the WHO Child Growth Standards in Four CountriesJournal of Nutrition, 2007
- Comparison of the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards and the National Center for Health Statistics/WHO international growth reference: implications for child health programmesPublic Health Nutrition, 2006
- Worldwide practices in child growth monitoringThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2004
- Childhood malnutrition and its predictors in rural MalawiPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2003
- Trends and measurement of HIV prevalence in northern MalawiAIDS, 2003
- Timing of growth faltering in rural MalawiArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2003
- The long-term impact of HIV and orphanhood on the mortality and physical well-being of children in rural MalawiAIDS, 2003
- Complementary feeding practices and dietary intakes from complementary foods amongst weanlings in rural MalawiEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2001