Relative Importance of the Area and Shape of Patches to the Diversity of Multiple Taxa
- 3 December 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Conservation Biology
- Vol. 22 (6), 1513-1522
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01024.x
Abstract
Although enhancing reserve shape has been suggested as an alternative to enlarging nature reserves, the importance of reserve shape relative to reserve area remains unclear. Here we examined the relative importance of area and shape of forest patches to species richness, species composition, and species abundance (abundance of each species) for 3 taxa (33 birds, 41 butterflies, and 91 forest-floor plants) in a fragmented landscape in central Hokkaido, northern Japan. We grouped the species according to their potential edge responses (interior-, neutral-, and edge-species groups for birds and forest-floor plants, woodland- and open-land-species groups for butterflies) and analyzed them separately. We used a shape index that was independent of area as an index of shape circularization. Hierarchical partitioning and variation partitioning revealed that patch area was generally more important than patch shape for species richness and species composition of birds and butterflies. For forest-floor plants, effects of patch area and shape were small, whereas effects of local forest structure were large. Patch area and circularization generally increased abundances of interior species of birds and forest-floor plants and woodland species of butterflies. Nevertheless, only patch circularization increased abundances of 1 woodland species of butterfly and 2 and 6 interior species of birds and forest-floor plants, respectively. We did not find any significant interaction effects between patch area and shape. Our results suggest that although reserves generally should be large and circular, there is a trade-off between patch area and shape, which should be taken into consideration when managing reserves.This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of habitat area and edge in fragmented landscapes: definitively distinct or inevitably intertwined?This review is one of a series dealing with some aspects of the impact of habitat fragmentation on animals and plants. This series is one of several virtual symposia focussing on ecological topics that will be published in the Journal from time to time.Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2007
- Landscape patterns influencing bird assemblages in a fragmented neotropical cloud forestBiological Conservation, 2005
- Small patches can be valuable for biodiversity conservation: two case studies on birds in southeastern AustraliaBiological Conservation, 2002
- CONTRIBUTION OF SMALL HABITAT FRAGMENTS TO CONSERVATION OF INSECT COMMUNITIES OF GRASSLAND–CROPLAND LANDSCAPES*Ecological Applications, 2002
- Birds in a Farmland-More Species in Small than in Large Habitat IslandConservation Biology, 1991
- THE CONTRIBUTION OF POPULATION AND COMMUNITY BIOLOGY TO CONSERVATION SCIENCEAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1988
- Breeding Birds of Isolated Woodlots: Area and Habitat RelationshipsEcology, 1987
- Is there a best shape for nature reserves?Biological Conservation, 1985
- Land Birds on Northern Islands: A Sampling Metaphor for Insular ColonizationOikos, 1983
- Island Biogeography and Conservation: Strategy and LimitationsScience, 1976