A comparison of MRI and PET scanning in surgically staged loco-regionally advanced cervical cancer: Potential impact on treatment
- 29 July 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer
- Vol. 11 (4), 263-271
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1438.2001.011004263.x
Abstract
Narayan K, Hicks RJ, Jobling T, Bernshaw D, McKenzie AF. A comparison of MRI and PET scanning in surgically staged loco-regionally advanced cervical cancer: Potential impact on treatment. The aim of this study was to assess whether positron emission tomography (PET) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could obviate the need for surgical staging in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma being planned for radiotherapy (RT). Imaging findings were compared to surgical staging in 27 patients including three with recent resection of the primary tumor. Both PET and MRI visualized all 24 residual cervical tumors. Primary tumor volume, as measured by MRI scan, ranged from 1.25 cc to 140 cc. In 24 patients evaluable for pelvic nodal status, PET had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 83%, 92%, 91% and 85%, respectively, with 88% accuracy. MRI detected only six in 12 (50%) patients with confirmed pelvic nodal disease, all of which were also seen by CT and PET, with an overall accuracy of 75%. PET detected only four in seven (57%) cases with confirmed para-aortic (PA) involvement. All histologically confirmed sites not visualized on PET were <1 cm. Without surgical staging, six in 10 (60%) patients with histologically proven pelvic nodal disease would not have received pelvic boost if guided by MRI alone, compared to two in 10 (20%) patients guided by PET alone or in combination with MRI. All four patients with positive PA on PET were confirmed on histology or clinical follow-up, including one case that proved to be a false negative one on surgery . However, in three cases, PET would have yielded an inadequate radiation volume. In conclusion, the positive predictive value of PET in the pelvis and para-aortic region appears sufficient to obviate lymph nodal sampling, but sampling is still required to exclude small-volume disease cranial to sites of abnormality on PET. MRI has insufficient accuracy for nodal staging to impact management.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Mediastinal Staging in the 1990s—Meta-analytic Comparison Of PET and CTRadiology, 1999
- Concurrent Cisplatin-Based Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Pelvic Radiation with Concurrent Chemotherapy Compared with Pelvic and Para-Aortic Radiation for High-Risk Cervical CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Pet scanning in head and neck oncology: A reviewHead & Neck, 1998
- Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancerThe Lancet, 1997
- Feasability of retroperitoneal pelvic lymph node exploration in cervical carcinoma. Assessment of morbidity in 33 cases treated by combined radio-surgery or definitive radiotherapyRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1996
- Severe radiation morbidity in carcinoma of the cervix: impact of pretherapy surgical staging and previous surgeryInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- Extended field irradiation for carcinoma of the uterine cervix with positive periaortic nodesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1992
- Para-aortic lymph node irradiation in carcinoma of the cervix after exploratory laparotomy and biopsy-proven positive aortic nodesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1982
- Incidence, significance, and follow-up of para-aortic lymph node metastases in late invasive carcinoma of the cervixAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1977