A New Method for Grading the Severity of Keratoconus
- 1 August 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Cornea
- Vol. 25 (7), 794-800
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000226359.26678.d1
Abstract
To define a new method for grading severity of keratoconus, the Keratoconus Severity Score (KSS). A rationale for grading keratoconus severity was developed using common clinical markers plus 2 corneal topographic indices, creating a 0 to 5 severity score. An initial test set of 1012 eyes, including normal eyes, eyes with abnormal corneal and topographic findings but not keratoconus, and eyes with keratoconus having a wide range of severity, was used to determine cutpoints for the KSS. Validation set 1, comprising data from 128 eyes, was assigned a KSS and compared with a clinician's ranking of severity termed the "gold standard" to determine if the scale fairly represented how a clinician would grade disease severity. kappa statistics, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. A program was developed to automate the determination of the score. This was tested against a manual assignment of KSS in 2121 (validation set 2) eyes from the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study, as well as normal eyes and abnormal eyes without keratoconus. Ten percent of eyes underwent repeat manual assignment of KSS to determine the variability of manual assignment of a score. From initial assessments, the KSS used 2 corneal topography indices: average corneal power and root mean square (RMS) error for higher-order Zernike terms derived from the first corneal surface wavefront. Clinical signs including Vogt striae, Fleischer rings, and corneal scarring were also included. Last, a manual interpretation of the map pattern was included. Validation set 1 yielded a kappa statistic of 0.904, with sensitivities ranging from 0.64 to 1.00 and specificities ranging from 0.93 to 0.98. The sensitivity and specificity for determining nonkeratoconus from keratoconus were both 1.00. Validation set 2 showed kappa statistics of 0.94 and 0.95 for right and left eyes, respectively. Test-retest analysis yielded kappa statistics of 0.84 and 0.83 for right and left eyes, respectively. A simple and reliable grading system for keratoconus was developed that can be largely automated. Such a grading scheme could be useful in genetic studies for a complex trait such as keratoconus requiring a quantitative measure of disease presence and severity.This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- VSX1Mutational Analysis in a Series of Italian Patients Affected by Keratoconus: Detection of a Novel MutationInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2005
- Concomitant Keratoconus and Macular Corneal DystrophyCornea, 2004
- Videokeratographic anomalies in familial keratoconusOphthalmology, 2004
- A locus for autosomal dominant keratoconus maps to human chromosome 3p14-q13Journal of Medical Genetics, 2004
- Microarray analysis identified differentially expressed genes in keratocytes from keratoconus patientsCurrent Eye Research, 2004
- Familial Keratoconus with Cataract: Linkage to the Long Arm of Chromosome 15 and Exclusion of Candidate GenesInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2003
- KeratoconusSurvey of Ophthalmology, 1998
- A 48-Year Clinical and Epidemiologic Study of KeratoconusAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1986
- Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disordersSurvey of Ophthalmology, 1984
- A KERATOSCOPIC SURVEY OF 13,395 EYESOptometry and Vision Science, 1959