Combining Evidence in Nursing Research
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Nursing Research
- Vol. 54 (1), 56???62-62
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200501000-00008
Abstract
Background The knowledge explosion in health care coupled with recent evidence-based practice initiatives has increased both the need for and the production of reviews of past research. The proliferation of such reviews has contributed to inconsistency in methods and terminology. Differing methods for integrative reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and qualitative reviews have been proposed, yet are not clearly differentiated in published reports. Although there are common features to these methods, each method has a distinct purpose, sampling frame, definition, and type of analysis. Approach The literature on research review methods was analyzed and synthesized. Specific attention was directed toward the issues specific to combining primary nursing research studies. Results The defining characteristics of different research review methods, the common stages of all research reviews, and criteria for evaluating quality are described. Discussion Greater clarity regarding research review methods has the potential to enhance methodological rigor and subsequently the applicability of findings of all review methods to practice and policy.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta‐analysesResearch in Nursing & Health, 2003
- Grey Literature in Meta-AnalysesNursing Research, 2003
- Beyond MEDLINE for Literature SearchesJournal of Nursing Scholarship, 2003
- An example of the use of systematic reviews to answer an effectiveness question.Western Journal of Nursing Research, 2003
- A Framework for Developing a Coding Scheme for Meta-AnalysisWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 2003
- A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative ResearchMCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 2002
- Meta-analysis: A Tool for Evidence-based PracticeAACN Advanced Critical Care, 2001
- Facilitating the work of a meta-analystResearch in Nursing & Health, 1999
- Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic ReviewsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Types of Errors in Synthesizing Research in EducationReview of Educational Research, 1996