Prevalence of Fracture and Fragment Embolization of Bard Retrievable Vena Cava Filters and Clinical Implications Including Cardiac Perforation and Tamponade
Open Access
- 8 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Internal Medicine
- Vol. 170 (20), 1827-1831
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.316
Abstract
Background Vena cava filters represent an alternative treatment option for patients with contraindications to anticoagulation, or they might serve as adjunctive treatment for continued emboli despite anticoagulation. The fracture of a filter strut with subsequent end-organ embolization is a rarely reported but potentially life-threatening occurrence. Methods We sought to determine the prevalence of fracture and embolization of the Bard Recovery (first generation) and the Bard G2 (second generation) vena cava filters. A retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted by evaluating all patients who received either a Bard Recovery or Bard G2 filter from April 2004 until January 2009. A total of 189 patients had undergone implantation: 1 pregnant woman and 35 patients who died were excluded from our study. In addition, 10 patients who had the filter removed were also excluded. Ultimately, 80 patients participated in the trial. Subjects underwent fluoroscopy to assess the filter's integrity. Embolized struts were localized by fluoroscopy. Echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography were performed in patients with fragment embolization to the heart. Results Thirteen of 80 patients had at least 1 strut fracture (16%). At least 1 strut in 7 of the 28 Bard Recovery filters fractured and embolized (25%). In 5 of these 7 cases, patients had at least 1 fragment embolize to the heart (71%). Three patients experienced life-threatening symptoms of ventricular tachycardia and/or tamponade, including 1 patient who experienced sudden death at home. Six of 52 Bard G2 filters fractured (12%). In 2 of these 6 cases, the patients had asymptomatic end-organ fragment embolization. Conclusion The Bard Recovery and Bard G2 filters had high prevalences of fracture and embolization, with potentially life-threatening sequelae.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Removal of the G2 Filter: Differences between Implantation Times Greater and Less than 180 DaysJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2009
- Comparison of the Recovery and G2 Filter as Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava FiltersJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2009
- Bard Recovery Filter: Evaluation and Management of Vena Cava Limb Perforation, Fracture, and MigrationJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2009
- Fractured Inferior Vena Cava Filter Strut Presenting as a Penetrating Foreign Body in the Right Ventricle: Report of a CaseJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 2008
- Trends in the Incidence of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: A 35-Year Population-Based Study.Blood, 2006
- Right Ventricular Migration of a Recovery IVC Filter’s Fractured Wire with Subsequent Pericardial TamponadeCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2006
- Experience with the Recovery Filter as a Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava FilterJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2005
- Long-term results of the Simon nitinol inferior vena cava filterEuropean Radiology, 1998
- Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters: follow-up of seven designs in 320 patients.Radiology, 1993