Is It Time to Centralize High-risk Cancer Care in the United States? Comparison of Outcomes of Esophagectomy Between England and the United States
- 1 July 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 262 (1), 79-85
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000805
Abstract
To determine the difference in in-hospital mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS) after esophagectomy between the United States and England. Since 2001, complex procedures such as esophagectomy have been centralized in England, but in the United States no formal plan for centralization exists. Patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer between 2005 and 2010 were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (United States) and the Hospital Episodes Statistics (England). In-hospital mortality and LOS were compared. There were 7433 esophagectomies performed in 66 English hospitals and 5858 resections in 775 US hospitals; median number of resections per center per year was 17.5 in England and 2 in the United States. In-hospital mortality was greater in US hospitals (5.50% vs 4.20%, P = 0.001). In multiple regression analysis, predictors of mortality included patient age, comorbidities, hospital volume, and surgery performed in the United States [odds ratio (OR) = 1.20 (1.02–1.41), P = 0.03]. Median LOS was greater in the English hospitals (15 vs 12 days, P Conclusions: The findings from this international comparison suggest that centralization of high-risk cancer surgery to centers of excellence with a high procedural volume translates into an improved clinical outcome. These findings should be factored into discussions regarding future service configuration of major cancer surgery in the United States.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hospital volume, proportion resected and mortality from oesophageal and gastric cancer: a population-based study in England, 2004–2008Gut, 2012
- Comparison of 30-day, 90-day and in-hospital postoperative mortality for eight different cancer typesBritish Journal of Surgery, 2012
- Volume-Outcome Relationship in Surgery for Esophageal malignancy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 2000-2011Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2012
- Hospital volume and survival in oesophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2011
- Trends in Hospital Volume and Operative Mortality for High-Risk SurgeryThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Re-organisation of oesophago-gastric cancer care in England: progress and remaining challengesBMC Health Services Research, 2009
- Hospital Volume and Late Survival After Cancer SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rateBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Surgical workload and outcome after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardiaBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002