A side-by-side comparison of Rotorod and Burkard pollen and spore collections
- 1 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
- Vol. 111 (2), 118-125
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2013.05.021
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative study of different methods for capturing airborne pollen, and effects of vegetation and meteorological variablesAerobiologia, 2008
- Comparison of the Rotorod to other air samplers for the determination of Ambrosia artemisiifolia pollen concentrations conducted in the Environmental Exposure UnitAerobiologia, 2005
- Sampling devicesImmunology and Allergy Clinics of North America, 2003
- How ill the wind? Issues in aeroallergen samplingJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2003
- The effect of windspeed on pollen and spore counts collected with the Rotorod Sampler and Burkard spore trapAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2000
- Comparing pollen and spore counts collected with the Rotorod Sampler and Burkard spore trapAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 1999
- Peut-on comparer les résultats de différents types de capteurs polliniques?Grana, 1992
- Aerial spore dispersal close to a focus of diseaseAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1989
- Comparative particle recoveries by the retracting rotorod, rotoslide and Burkard spore trap sampling in a compact arrayInternational Journal of Biometeorology, 1980
- Evaluation of Four Spore Traps for Monitoring Discharge of Ascospores of Venturia inaequalisPhytopathology®, 1976