Of souls, selves, and cerebrums: a reply to Himma
Open Access
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- comment
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 31 (1), 56-60
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.006650
Abstract
Ken Himma argues that a human being becomes a moral person at the commencement of brain activity. In response to Himma, the author offers (1) brief comments on Himma’s project, (2) an alternative account of the human person that maintains that a human being is a human person by nature as long as it exists, and (3) a counterexample to Himma’s position that shows it cannot account for the wrongness of the purposeful creation of anencephalic-like children. The author concludes with replies to two challenges to his position.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subjectJournal of Medical Ethics, 2005
- The Pro‐Life Argument from Substantial Identity: A DefenceBioethics, 2004
- The Argument from Intrinsic Value: A CritiqueBioethics, 2000
- The Beginning of Personhood: A Thomistic Biological AnalysisBioethics, 2000
- Humanness, Personhood, and the Right to DieFaith and Philosophy, 1995
- Can we achieve immortality? The ethics of cloning and other life-extension technologies.1989
- Personhood and the Conception EventNew Scholasticism, 1978