Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro–computed tomography
Top Cited Papers
- 30 June 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 25 (7), 1468-1486
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.141
Abstract
Use of high‐resolution micro–computed tomography (µCT) imaging to assess trabecular and cortical bone morphology has grown immensely. There are several commercially available µCT systems, each with different approaches to image acquisition, evaluation, and reporting of outcomes. This lack of consistency makes it difficult to interpret reported results and to compare findings across different studies. This article addresses this critical need for standardized terminology and consistent reporting of parameters related to image acquisition and analysis, and key outcome assessments, particularly with respect to ex vivo analysis of rodent specimens. Thus the guidelines herein provide recommendations regarding (1) standardized terminology and units, (2) information to be included in describing the methods for a given experiment, and (3) a minimal set of outcome variables that should be reported. Whereas the specific research objective will determine the experimental design, these guidelines are intended to ensure accurate and consistent reporting of µCT‐derived bone morphometry and density measurements. In particular, the methods section for papers that present µCT‐based outcomes must include details of the following scan aspects: (1) image acquisition, including the scanning medium, X‐ray tube potential, and voxel size, as well as clear descriptions of the size and location of the volume of interest and the method used to delineate trabecular and cortical bone regions, and (2) image processing, including the algorithms used for image filtration and the approach used for image segmentation. Morphometric analyses should be based on 3D algorithms that do not rely on assumptions about the underlying structure whenever possible. When reporting µCT results, the minimal set of variables that should be used to describe trabecular bone morphometry includes bone volume fraction and trabecular number, thickness, and separation. The minimal set of variables that should be used to describe cortical bone morphometry includes total cross‐sectional area, cortical bone area, cortical bone area fraction, and cortical thickness. Other variables also may be appropriate depending on the research question and technical quality of the scan. Standard nomenclature, outlined in this article, should be followed for reporting of results. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral ResearchKeywords
This publication has 110 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantification of adiposity in small rodents using micro-CTMethods, 2010
- Beam hardening artifacts in micro-computed tomography scanning can be reduced by X-ray beam filtration and the resulting images can be used to accurately measure BMDBone, 2009
- Quantitative assessment of articular cartilage morphology via EPIC-μCTOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2009
- Effects of PTH treatment on tibial bone of ovariectomized rats assessed by in vivo micro-CTOsteoporosis International, 2009
- Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: Relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical functionBone, 2009
- Pause Insertions During Cyclic In Vivo Loading Affect Bone HealingClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008
- Percolation theory relates corticocancellous architecture to mechanical function in vertebrae of inbred mouse strainsBone, 2008
- Micro-computed tomography of fatigue microdamage in cortical bone using a barium sulfate contrast agentJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2008
- The hypoxia-inducible factor α pathway couples angiogenesis to osteogenesis during skeletal developmentJCI Insight, 2007
- Analysis of cartilage matrix fixed charge density and three-dimensional morphology via contrast-enhanced microcomputed tomographyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006