Science, medicine, and the future: Artificial limbs
- 29 September 2001
- Vol. 323 (7315), 732-735
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7315.732
Abstract
Methods This paper is based on the clinical experience of the authors in Britain and the United States, a review of the literature, and information gathered from colleagues in rehabilitation medicine throughout the world.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Review of Orthopedic Injuries in Three Recent U.S. Military ConflictsMilitary Medicine, 2000
- Civilian Landmine Injuries in Sri LankaThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2000
- Evaluation of polypropylene prostheses designed by the International Committee of the Red Cross for trans tibial amputeesProsthetics and Orthotics International, 2000
- Evaluation of use and durability of polypropylene trans-tibial prosthesesProsthetics and Orthotics International, 1999
- Physiological Measurements of Walking and Running in People With Transtibial Amputations With 3 Different ProsthesesJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 1999
- Silicone suspension of external prosthesesThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1997
- Energy cost of walking: Comparison of “intelligent prosthesis” with conventional mechanismArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1997
- Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputationsArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1994
- Comprehensive Analysis of Energy Storing Prosthetic Feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot Versus Standard SACH FootArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1993
- The ICEROSS conceptProsthetics and Orthotics International, 1993