Preregistering qualitative research
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 March 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Accountability in Research
- Vol. 26 (3), 229-244
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147
Abstract
The threat to reproducibility and awareness of current rates of research misbehavior sparked initiatives to better academic science. One initiative is preregistration of quantitative research. We investigate whether the preregistration format could also be used to boost the credibility of qualitative research. A crucial distinction underlying preregistration is that between prediction and postdiction. In qualitative research, data are used to decide which way interpretation should move forward, using data to generate hypotheses and new research questions. Qualitative research is thus a real-life example of postdiction research. Some may object to the idea of preregistering qualitative studies because qualitative research generally does not test hypotheses, and because qualitative research design is typically flexible and subjective. We rebut these objections, arguing that making hypotheses explicit is just one feature of preregistration, that flexibility can be tracked using preregistration, and that preregistration would provide a check on subjectivity. We then contextualize preregistrations alongside another initiative to enhance credibility in qualitative research: the confirmability audit. Besides, preregistering qualitative studies is practically useful to combating dissemination bias and could incentivize qualitative researchers to report constantly on their study's development. We conclude with suggested modifications to the Open Science Framework preregistration form to tailor it for qualitative studies.Keywords
Funding Information
- Templeton World Charity Foundation (#TWCF0163/AB106)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pre-Analysis Plans Have Limited Upside, Especially Where Replications Are FeasibleJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2015
- Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testingFrontiers in Psychology, 2015
- Promoting Transparency in Social Science ResearchScience, 2014
- Fishing, Commitment, and Communication: A Proposal for Comprehensive Nonbinding Research RegistrationPolitical Analysis, 2013
- Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural ReformsInfection and Immunity, 2012
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey DataPLOS ONE, 2009
- Qualitative Health Research in the Era of Evidence-Based PracticeQualitative Health Research, 2006
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2005
- Scientists behaving badlyNature, 2005
- Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth)International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1985