Consciousness about own and others’ affects: A study of the validity of a revised version of the Affect Consciousness Interview
- 20 November 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 49 (6), 515-521
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00666.x
Abstract
This study presents a modified version of the affect consciousness interview (Monsen, Eilertsen, Melgård & Ödegård, 1996), intended to capture the individual's affective consciousness. The aim of the modified version – The Affect Consciousness Interview – Revised (ACI‐R) – is to measure consciousness about own and others’ affects. Three groups of patients (with eating disorder, relational and social problems or stress‐related problems), and one non‐clinical group were included in the study (N= 95). The results indicated that it was possible to achieve adequate interrater reliability, that the scores correlated meaningfully with other measures of mental functioning, and that the interview discriminated between different clinical groups and non‐clinical participants. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the ACI‐R is a promising instrument and that it should be explored further in order to study the organization of self‐experiences and the ability to be emotionally present in interactions with others.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Affect consciousness or mentalization? A comparison of two concepts with regard to affect development and affect regulationScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2006
- Emotion, Social Function, and PsychopathologyReview of General Psychology, 1998
- Mentalization and the changing aims of child psychoanalysisPsychoanalytic Dialogues, 1998
- Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988
- Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the scl-90: A study in construct validationJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1977
- Structural analysis of social behavior.Psychological Review, 1974