Prevention and treatment of hymenoptera venom allergy: guidelines for clinical practice
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 November 2005
- Vol. 60 (12), 1459-1470
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00960.x
Abstract
Based on the knowledge of the living conditions and habitat of social Aculeatae a series of recommendations have been formulated which can potentially greatly minimize the risk of field re‐sting. After a systemic sting reaction, patients should be referred to an allergy specialist for evaluation of their allergy, and if necessary venom immunotherapy (VIT). An emergency medical kit should be supplied, its use clearly demonstrated and repeatably practised until perfected. This should be done under the supervision of a doctor or a trained nurse. Epinephrine by intramuscolar injection is regarded as the treatment of choice for acute anaphylaxis. H1‐antihistamines alone or in combination with corticosteroids may be effective in mild to moderate reactions confined to the skin and may support the value of treatment with epinephrine in full‐blown anaphylaxis. Up to 75% of the patients with a history of systemic anaphylactic sting reaction develop systemic symptoms once again when re‐stung. Venom immunotherapy is a highly effective treatment for individuals with a history of systemic reaction and who have specific IgE to venom allergens. The efficacy of VIT in yellow jacket venom allergic patients has been demonstrated also by assessing health‐related quality of life. If both skin tests and serum venom specific IgE turn negative, VIT may be stopped after 3 years. After VIT lasting 3–5 years, most patients with mild to moderate anaphylactic symptoms remain protected following discontinuation of VIT even with positive skin tests. Longer term or lifelong treatment should be considered in high‐risk patients. Because of the small but relevant risk of re‐sting reactions, in these patients, emergency kits, including epinephrine auto‐injectors, should be discussed with every patient when stopping VIT.Keywords
This publication has 105 references indexed in Scilit:
- IL‐10 and TGF‐β cooperate in the regulatory T cell response to mucosal allergens in normal immunity and specific immunotherapyEuropean Journal of Immunology, 2003
- Side‐effects of insect venom immunotherapy:results from an EAACI multicenter studyAllergy, 2000
- Effects of peptide therapy on ex vivo T-cell responsesJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1998
- The use of epinephrine in the treatment of anaphylaxisJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1994
- Rapid Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: comparative safety of three protocolsClinical & Experimental Allergy, 1993
- Occupational allergy to bumble bee venomClinical & Experimental Allergy, 1993
- Discontinuation of bee venom immunotherapy in children and adolescentsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1985
- A prospective study of the natural history of large local reactions after Hymenoptera stings in childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1984
- Epidemiologic study of insect allergy in children. II. Effect of accidental stings in allergic childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1983
- A Controlled Trial of Immunotherapy in Insect HypersensitivityThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1978