Diagnosis-dependent misclassification of infections using administrative data variably affected incidence and mortality estimates in ICU patients
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 60 (2), 155.e1-155.e11
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.05.013
Abstract
To determine the accuracy of hospital discharge diagnoses in identifying severe infections among intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and estimate the impact of misclassification on incidence and 1-year mortality. Sepsis, pneumonia, and central nervous system (CNS) infections among 7,615 ICU admissions were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnoses from the Swedish hospital discharge register (HDR). Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated using ICU database diagnoses as reference standard, with inclusion in sepsis trials (IST) as secondary reference for sepsis. CNS infections were accurately captured (sensitivity 95.4% [confidence interval (CI)=86.8-100] and specificity 99.6% [CI=99.4-99.8]). Community-acquired sepsis (sensitivity 51.1% [CI=41.0-61.2] and specificity 99.4% [CI=99.2-99.6]) and primary pneumonia (sensitivity 38.2% [CI=31.2-45.2] and specificity 98.6% [CI=98.2-99.0]) were more accurately detected than sepsis and pneumonia in general. One-year mortality was accurately estimated for primary pneumonia but underestimated for community-acquired sepsis. However, there were only small differences in sensitivity and specificity between HDR and ICU data in the ability to identify IST. ICD-9 appeared more accurate for sepsis, whereas ICD-10 was more accurate for pneumonia. Accuracy of hospital discharge diagnoses varied depending on diagnosis and case definition. The pattern of misclassification makes estimates of relative risk more accurate than estimates of absolute risk.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Local and national electronic databases in Norway demonstrate a varying degree of validityJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Validation study of the Victorian Birth Defects RegisterJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2004
- International classification of diseases–9th revision coding for preeclampsia: how accurate is it?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Evaluating the Role of Patient Sample Definitions for Quality Indicators Sensitive to Nurse Staffing PatternsMedical Care, 2004
- The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics A comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registryJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- A systematic review of discharge coding accuracyJournal of Public Health, 2001
- Can Hospital Discharge Diagnosis Be Used for Surveillance of Bacteremia? A Data Quality Study of a Danish Hospital Discharge RegistryInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1998
- Quality of Data Regarding Diagnoses of Spinal Disorders in Administrative Databases. A Multicenter Study*The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1997
- A Framework for Evaluation of Secondary Data Sources for Epidemiological ResearchInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Identification of cases of meningococcal disease: data quality in two Danish population-based information systems during a 14-year periodInternational Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, 1995