Inadequate identification of small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses at an urban teaching hospital
- 2 February 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Vol. 109 (2), 140-143
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.023
Abstract
Objective To ascertain the likelihood of identifying small for gestational age (SGA) neonates prenatally (below the 10th percentile for gestational age). Methods On admission for delivery, the charts of singletons with reliable gestational age (GA) were reviewed to determine whether intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) was suspected, clinically or sonographically. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used with the accurate identification of SGA as the dependent variable and 13 independent variables. Results Over 10 months, 1502 pregnant women met the inclusion criteria and 16% of neonates were born SGA. Before delivery, only 10% (95% confidence interval 6%–14%) of newborns identified as SGA were detected, and 7% weighed below the 5th percentile. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified 4 factors that made a significant independent contribution to the detection of SGA: younger maternal age, size less than date, sonographic examination within 4 weeks of delivery, and a history of substance abuse. Conclusions Because we failed to identify 90% of SGA with fundal height measurements, the likelihood of detecting most growth‐restricted fetuses clinically is low. If other investigators confirm these findings, a paradigm shift is warranted to improve the detection of IUGR.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Detection of Macrosomia at a Teaching HospitalAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 2008
- Sonographic estimate of birth weight among high-risk patients: Feasibility and factors influencing accuracyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006
- Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: Use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10%The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2006
- A review of sonographic estimate of fetal weight: Vagaries of accuracyThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2005
- ACOG Practice Bulletin #58: Ultrasonography in PregnancyObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- ACOG Practice Bulletin #55: Management of Postterm PregnancyObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- A Randomized Controlled Trial in a Hospital Population of Ultrasound Measurement Screening For the Small For Dates BabyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Detection of small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses by ultrasound screening in a high risk population: a randomized controlled studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- A randomized study of fetal abdominal diameter and fetal weight estimation for detection of light‐for‐gestation infants in low‐risk pregnanciesBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987
- Screening for small for dates fetuses: a controlled trial.BMJ, 1984