Use of intravenous infusion sedation among mechanically ventilated patients in the United States*
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 37 (12), 3031-3039
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b02eff
Abstract
Many studies compare the efficacy of different forms of intravenous infusion sedation for critically ill patients, but little is known about the actual use of these medications. We sought to describe current use of intravenous infusion sedation in mechanically ventilated patients in U.S. intensive care units. Retrospective cohort study of intravenous infusion sedation among mechanically ventilated patients. Intravenous sedatives examined included benzodiazepines (midazolam and lorazepam), propofol, and dexmedetomidine. Use was defined as having received an intravenous infusion for any time period during the stay in intensive care. One hundred seventy-four intensive care units contributing data to Project IMPACT from 2001 through 2007. All patients who received mechanical ventilation. None. Of 109,671 mechanically ventilated patients, 56,443 (51.5%, 95% confidence interval 51.2–51.8) received one or more intravenous infusion sedatives. Sedative use increased over time, from 39.7% (38.7–40.6) of patients in 2001 to 66.7% (65.7–67.7) in 2007 (p < .001). Most patients who received intravenous infusion sedation received propofol (82.2%, 81.9–82.5) vs. benzodiazepines (31.1%, 30.7–31.5) or dexmedetomidine (4.0%, 3.8–4.2). Of the patients, 66.2% (65.8–66.6) received only propofol, and 16.2% (15.9–16.5) only benzodiazepines. Among patients mechanically ventilated >96 hrs, propofol infusions were more common. Intravenous infusion narcotics (fentanyl, morphine, or hydromorphone) were used more frequently among patients who received benzodiazepines (70.1%, 69.1–71.0) compared with propofol (23.9%, 23.5–24.3), p < .001. The percentage of mechanically ventilated patients receiving intravenous infusion sedation has increased over time. Sedation with an infusion of propofol was much more common than with benzodiazepines or dexmedetomidine, even for patients mechanically ventilated beyond 96 hrs.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Canadian survey of the use of sedatives, analgesics, and neuromuscular blocking agents in critically ill patients*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Practice Variation in Respiratory Therapy Documentation During Mechanical VentilationSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2003
- Patients’ recollections of stressful experiences while receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit*Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Propofol and Midazolam versus Propofol Alone for Sedation following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled TrialAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 2002
- Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adultCritical Care Medicine, 2002
- Sedative and analgesic practice in the intensive care unit: the results of a European surveyBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001
- Intensive care sedation: a review of current British practiceIntensive Care Medicine, 2000
- Sedation in the Intensive Care UnitJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2000
- Relationship between behavioral and physiological indicators of pain, critical care patients' self-reports of pain, and opioid administrationCritical Care Medicine, 1997
- Use of Sedating Drugs and Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation for Respiratory FailureJAMA, 1991