Dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐4 inhibitors and pancreatic cancer: a cohort study
- 11 August 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
- Vol. 16 (12), 1247-1256
- https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12379
Abstract
Aim To compare pancreatic cancer incidence and diagnostic evaluation among patients initiating dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitor treatment with those initiating sulfonylureas (SU) and thiazolidinediones (TZD). Methods Medicare claims data were examined in a new‐user active‐comparator cohort study. Patients >65 years with no prescriptions for DPP‐4 inhibitors, SU or TZD at baseline were included if they had at least two claims for the same drug within 180 days. Using an as‐treated approach and propensity score‐adjusted Cox models, we estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for pancreatic cancer. Diagnostic evaluations were compared using risk ratios. Results In the DPP‐4 inhibitor versus SU comparison, there were 18 179 patients who initiated treatment with DPP‐4 inhibitors, of whom 26 developed pancreatic cancer (interquartile range follow‐up 5–18 months). In the DPP‐4 inhibitor versus TZD comparison there were 29 366 people initiating DPP‐4 inhibitor treatment and 52 of these developed pancreatic cancer. The risk of pancreatic cancer with DPP‐4 inhibitor treatment was lower relative to SU treatment (HR: 0.6, CI: 0.4–0.9) and similar to TZD treatment (HR: 1.0, 95% CI: 0.7–1.4). After the first 6 months of follow‐up were excluded to reduce the potential for reverse causality, the results were not altered. The probability of diagnostic evaluation after commencing DPP‐4 inhibitor treatment (79.3%) was similar to that for TZD (74.1%, risk ratio 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05–1.07) and SU (74.6%) (risk ratio 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05–1.07). The probability of diagnostic evaluation before the index date (date of initiating treatment) was ∼80% for all cohorts. Conclusion Although the present study was limited by sample size and the observed duration of treatment in the USA, our well‐controlled population‐based study suggests there is no higher short‐term pancreatic cancer risk with DPP‐4 inhibitor treatment relative to SU or TZD treatment.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Center for Research Resources
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000083)
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emerging DPP-4 inhibitors: focus on linagliptin for type 2 diabetesDiabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity, 2013
- Risk of Breast Cancer After Onset of Type 2 DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2011
- Pancreatitis, Pancreatic, and Thyroid Cancer With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1–Based TherapiesGastroenterology, 2011
- Cohort Study of Pioglitazone and Cancer Incidence in Patients With DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2011
- Acute Pancreatitis in Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Exenatide or SitagliptinDiabetes Care, 2010
- Cigarette Smoking and Pancreatic Cancer: A Pooled Analysis From the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort ConsortiumAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studiesThe Lancet, 2008
- Developments in Post-marketing Comparative Effectiveness ResearchClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2007
- Agreement of diagnosis and its date for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors between medicare claims and cancer registry dataCancer Causes & Control, 2007
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983