Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Acute and Subacute Residential Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review
- 1 November 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in Psychiatric Services
- Vol. 64 (11), 1140-1149
- https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201200427
Abstract
Objective: In recognition of a service gap between hospital inpatient and community-based care, a range of mental health services have been developed to provide treatment and support for people with mental illness outside the inpatient setting. Acute and subacute residential services provide care for individuals experiencing episodes of acute mental illness and provide transitional services to assist people in their reintegration into the community. This article provides a systematic review of studies evaluating the effectiveness of these alternative services. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane with no years specified to identify studies that have evaluated the clinical effectiveness, user satisfaction, or cost-effectiveness of acute or subacute residential treatments. Outcome data were extracted from quantitative studies, and themes relevant to service satisfaction were extracted from qualitative studies. Results: A total of 26 studies were identified that evaluated the effectiveness of acute or subacute residential services. Most studies of acute residential units demonstrated clinical improvements equal to those of inpatient units and similar readmission rates, as well as cost benefits. User satisfaction was generally higher for clients of acute residential units. Only three studies examined subacute units, a number not sufficient to evaluate the effectiveness of these services. Conclusions: Acute residential mental health services offer treatment outcomes equivalent to those of inpatient units, with users reporting high satisfaction. Acute residential services offer a cost-effective alternative to inpatient services. Further research is needed to determine client groups that will benefit most from these alternative services.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of admissions to women's crisis houses compared with traditional psychiatric wards: pilot patient-preference randomised controlled trialThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2010
- Alternatives to standard acute in-patient care in England: readmissions, service use and cost after dischargeThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2010
- Alternatives to standard acute in-patient care in England: short-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectivenessThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2010
- Alternatives to standard acute in-patient care in England: differences in content of care and staff–patient contactThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2010
- Service users' experiences of residential alternatives to standard acute wards: qualitative study of similarities and differencesThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2010
- A Randomized Trial of a Mental Health Consumer‐Managed Alternative to Civil Commitment for Acute Psychiatric CrisisAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 2008
- Evaluating the effectiveness of a women's crisis house: a prospective observational studyPsychiatric Bulletin, 2006
- Recovery, self management and the expert patient – Changing the culture of mental health from a UK perspectiveJournal of Mental Health, 2005
- The Nottingham Acute Bed Study: Alternatives to acute psychiatric careThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1997
- Acute care treatment services (acts): A model program for providing acute psychiatric services in a homelike environment in an institutional settingBehavioral Interventions, 1986