Practitioner Review: Psychological treatments for children and adolescents with conduct disorder problems – a systematic review and meta‐analysis
- 8 August 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Vol. 58 (1), 4-18
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12590
Abstract
This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments for conduct disorder (CD) problems in children and adolescents, based on child, parent and teacher report. PubMed, PsycINFO and EMBASE were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between January 1970 and March 2015. Main inclusion criteria were nonpharmacological treatment, participants younger than 18 years, clinical CD problems/diagnosis, randomized controlled trials and inclusion of at least one CD problem-related outcome. Treatment efficacy is expressed in effect sizes (ESs) calculated for each rater (parent, teacher, self and blinded observer). Of 1,549 articles retrieved, 17 (published between June 2004 and January 2014) describing 19 interventions met the inclusion criteria. All studies used psychological treatments; only three studies included a blinded observer to rate CD problems. Most studies were of very poor to fair quality. ESs were significant but small for parent-reported outcomes (0.36, 95% CI = 0.27–0.47), teacher-reported outcomes (0.26, 95% CI = 0.12–0.49) and blinded observer outcomes (0.26, 95% CI = 0.06–0.47), and they were nonsignificant for self-reported outcomes (−0.01, 95% CI = −0.25 to 0.23). Comorbidity, gender, age, number of sessions, duration, intervention type, setting, medication use or dropout percentage did not influence the effect of treatment. Psychological treatments have a small effect in reducing parent-, teacher- and observer-rated CD problems in children and adolescents with clinical CD problems/diagnosis. There is not enough evidence to support one specific psychological treatment over another. Future studies should investigate the influence of participant characteristics (e.g. age of CD onset), use more homogeneous outcome measures and allow better evaluation of study quality. Many reports failed to provide detailed information to allow optimization of psychological treatment strategies.Funding Information
- European Union 7th Framework programs AGGRESSOTYPE (602805)
- MATRICS (603016)
- NWO Brain & Cognition (056-24-011)
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deconstructing the externalizing spectrum: Growth patterns of overt aggression, covert aggression, oppositional behavior, impulsivity/inattention, and emotion dysregulation between school entry and early adolescenceDevelopment and Psychopathology, 2013
- The Effects of the Fast Track Preventive Intervention on the Development of Conduct Disorder Across ChildhoodChild Development, 2011
- Conduct Disorder and the specifier callous and unemotional traits in the DSM-5European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2010
- Improving Access to Care and Clinical Outcome for Pediatric Behavioral Problems: A Randomized Trial of a Nurse-Administered Intervention in Primary CareJournal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 2010
- Parenting Intervention for Externalizing Behavior Problems in Children Born Premature: An Initial ExaminationJournal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 2010
- The transportability of multisystemic therapy to Sweden: Short-term results from a randomized trial of conduct-disordered youths.Journal of Family Psychology, 2008
- School-Based Interventions for Aggressive and Disruptive Behavior: Update of a Meta-AnalysisAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007
- The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boysAggressive Behavior, 2006
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002