A sensitivity and specificity comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in evaluation of suspicious breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1 February 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Breast
- Vol. 31, 157-166
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Addressing Dichotomous Data for Participants Excluded from Trial Analysis: A Guide for Systematic ReviewersPLOS ONE, 2013
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Fine needle aspiration versus touch imprint cytology in ultrasound-guided core of breast massesBreast Cancer Research, 2010
- Core needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration biopsy in breast—A historical perspective and opportunities in the modern eraDiagnostic Cytopathology, 2010
- Diagnosing breast lesions by fine needle aspiration cytology or core biopsy: which is better?Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010
- A comparision of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy according to tumor size of suspicious breast lesionsDiagnostic Cytopathology, 2007
- A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine‐needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesionsDiagnostic Cytopathology, 2007
- The Role of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of the Breast in the Core Biopsy EraPathology Case Reviews, 2007
- Fine‐needle aspiration cytology vs. core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesionsDiagnostic Cytopathology, 2003
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003