Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy and antimicrobial stewardship: challenges and checklists
Open Access
- 23 December 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Vol. 70 (4), 965-970
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku517
Abstract
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has become, for many countries, an established form of healthcare delivery. At the same time, there have been calls to ensure the prudent use of the existing antimicrobial armamentarium. For OPAT, this presents a dilemma. On one hand, stewardship principles look for the most effective agent with minimal collateral effects. In OPAT, whilst the aims of the service are similar, convenience of dosing to optimize early hospital discharge or admission avoidance may take precedence over an agent's spectrum of activity. This brief article aims to highlight the importance and explore the challenges of antimicrobial stewardship in the context of OPAT. Within the UK, the safe and effective use of antimicrobials is modelled around the IDSA/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America stewardship practice guidelines with local customization where appropriate. Current UK stewardship practice principles were compared with published good practice recommendations for OPAT to identify how OPAT could support the broader antimicrobial stewardship agenda. It is essential that antimicrobial stewardship teams should understand the challenges faced in the non-inpatient setting and the potential benefits/lower risks associated with avoided admission or shortened hospital stay in this population. Within its limitations, OPAT should practise stewardship principles, including optimization of intravenous to oral switch and the reporting of outcomes, healthcare-associated infections and re-admission rates. OPAT should report to the antimicrobial stewardship team. Ideally the OPAT team should be formally represented within the stewardship framework. A checklist has been proposed to aid OPAT services in ensuring they meet their stewardship agenda.This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk factors for failure of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) in infective endocarditisJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2013
- Antibiotic stewardship and early discharge from hospital: impact of a structured approach to antimicrobial managementJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2012
- Policy Statement on Antimicrobial Stewardship by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS)Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2012
- Good practice recommendations for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in adults in the UK: a consensus statementJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2012
- Factors associated with outcome and duration of therapy in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) patients with skin and soft-tissue infectionsInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2011
- Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): a UK perspectiveJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2009
- Comparison of the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of daptomycin in healthy adult volunteers following intravenous administration by 30 min infusion or 2 min injectionJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2009
- An outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) map to identify risks associated with an OPAT serviceJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2008
- Comment on: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): is it safe for selected patients to self-administer at home? A retrospective analysis of a large cohort over 13 years.Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2007
- Nurse-led management of uncomplicated cellulitis in the community: evaluation of a protocol incorporating intravenous ceftriaxoneJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2005