Optimizing the precision‐per‐unit‐time of quantitative MR metrics: Examples for T1, T2, and DTI
Open Access
- 26 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Vol. 57 (2), 380-387
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21144
Abstract
Quantitative MR metrics (e.g., T1, T2, diffusion coefficients, and magnetization transfer ratios (MTRs etc)) are often derived from two images collected with one acquisition parameter changed between them (the “two-point” method). Since a low signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) adversely affects the precision of these metrics, averaging is frequently used, although improvement accrues slowly—in proportion to the square root of imaging time. Fortunately, the relationship between the images' SNRs and the metric's precision can be exploited to our advantage. Using error propagation rules, we show that for a given sequence, specifying the total imaging time uniquely determines the optimal acquisition protocol. Specifically, instead of changing only one acquisition parameter and repeating the imaging pair until all available time is spent, we propose to adjust all of the parameters and the number of averages at each point according to their contribution to the sought metric's precision. The tactic is shown to increase the precision of the well-known two-point T1, T2, and diffusion coefficients estimation by 13–90% for the same sample, sequence, hardware, and duration. It is also shown that under this general framework, precision accrues faster than the square root of time. Tables of optimal parameters are provided for various experimental scenarios. Magn Reson Med 57:380–387, 2007.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady stateMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2003
- Diffusion‐tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis – a technical reviewNMR in Biomedicine, 2002
- Optimised diffusion-weighting for measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in human brainMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1997
- Axonal damage in acute multiple sclerosis lesionsBrain, 1997
- Noise in MRIMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996
- Measurement of T1 relaxation times of cardiac phosphate metabolites using BIR‐4 adiabatic RF pulses and a variable nutation methodMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1993
- Optimizing the precision in T1 relaxation estimation using limited flip anglesMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1987
- Driven-equilibrium single-pulse observation of T1 relaxation. A reevaluation of a rapid “new” method for determining NMR spin-lattice relaxation timesJournal of Magnetic Resonance (1969), 1985
- Strategies and tactics in NMR imaging relaxation time measurements. I. Minimizing relaxation time errors due to image noise—the ideal caseMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1985
- Optimal determination of relaxation times of fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance. Determination of spin-lattice relaxation times in chemically polarized speciesThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1974