Reflecting on the Use of IPA with Focus Groups: Pitfalls and Potentials
- 13 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Qualitative Research in Psychology
- Vol. 7 (3), 244-262
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880903121491
Abstract
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) is a phenomenological, hermeneutic method for analysing semi-structured interview data, supported by a robust theoretical foundation and detailed practical procedures. The use of IPA with focus group data does not yet have the same status, and it should not be assumed that either theory or practice can remain unchanged when applied to focus groups. Two core features of IPA are discussed and problematized in the context of focus group work: the negotiation of part-whole relationships and the management of the interplay between real-time discursive and post-hoc thematic sense-making. With both these issues, practical solutions are offered from our own research on care. Although it is possible to adjust the IPA method for group data, there remain some profound theoretical and epistemological questions about whether the resultant focus on the group-individual dynamic and the discursive construction of experience represents too fundamental a shift from the idiographic and the psychological to be considered “true IPA.” However, working through these issues and attempting to move from either/ors to both/ands are seen as being true to the spirit of phenomenological enquiry.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Investigating the Form and Dynamics of Crisis Episodes in Early Adulthood: The Application of a Composite Qualitative MethodQualitative Research in Psychology, 2010
- Dilemmas in decision-making about resuscitation—a focus group study of older peopleSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2006
- A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychologyPsychology & Health, 2006
- Treating first episode psychosis – the service users’ perspective: a focus group evaluationJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 2004
- The Status of Method: Flexibility, Consistency and CoherenceQualitative Research, 2003
- Re‐appraising HIV testing: An exploration of the psychosocial costs and benefits associated with learning one's HIV status in a purposive sample of Scottish gay menBritish Journal of Health Psychology, 2003
- The Meaning of ‘Satisfaction’ for People with Dermatological Problems: Reassessing Approaches to Qualitative Health Psychology ResearchJournal of Health Psychology, 2002
- Pattern and Process in Disclosure of Health Status by Women with Iatrogenically Acquired Hepatitis CJournal of Health Psychology, 2002
- The Impact of Iatrogenically Acquired Hepatitis C Infection on the Well-being and Relationships of a Group of Irish WomenJournal of Health Psychology, 2001
- Focus GroupsPsychology of Women Quarterly, 1999