Challenges in biobank governance in Sub-Saharan Africa
Open Access
- 11 September 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Ethics
- Vol. 14 (1), 35
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-35
Abstract
Biological sample and data transfer within and out of Africa is steeped in controversy With the H3Africa project now aiming to establish biobanks in Africa, it is essential that there are ethical and legal governance structures in place to oversee the operation of these biobanks. Such governance is essential to ensuring that donors are protected, that cultural perspectives are respected and that researchers have a ready availability of ethically sourced biological samples. A literature review of all legislation, regulations, guidelines and standard operating procedures on informed consent, confidentiality and the transfer of biological samples amongst countries in Sub-Saharan Africa was conducted. In addition, an examination of the websites of departments of health and national ethics committees was performed. Researchers and research ethics scholars in the field in various African countries were contacted for assistance. A literature review of all studies examining participants views on issues related to biobanking in Africa was carried out and five separate studies were found. It was found that biobanking guidelines differ substantially across Sub-Saharan Africa regarding biobanking and often conflicted across borders. This has the potential to negatively impact collaboration. Furthermore, the guidelines in place often do not recognise the ethical difficulties arising from the transfer of biological samples and are unsuitable to regulate biobanks. Additionally, there is insufficient research into the views of research participants and stakeholders on the use of biological /samples. Collaboration is necessary to ensure the success of biobanking projects in Africa. To achieve this, there should be some harmonization of guidelines across Africa which would aid in transferring biological samples across borders. These guidelines should reflect the unique ethical issues arising out of the storage and secondary uses of biological samples. Finally, further research into the views of research participants is necessary. Such studies should aid in the drafting of any new harmonization guidelines.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Access and use of human tissues from the developing world: ethical challenges and a way forward using a tissue trustBMC Medical Ethics, 2011
- Biobanken und Biomolekulare Ressourcen Forschungsinfrastruktur (BBMRI)Der Pathologe, 2008
- From genetic privacy to open consentNature Reviews Genetics, 2008
- Hippocrates revisited? Old ideals and new realitiesGenomic Medicine, 2008
- Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanksEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2007
- REUSE OF SAMPLES: ETHICAL ISSUES ENCOUNTERED BY TWO INSTITUTIONAL ETHICS REVIEW COMMITTEES IN KENYA1Bioethics, 2005
- Research on Stored Biological Samples: The Views of UgandansEthics & Human Research, 2005
- Informed Consent and BiobanksThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2005
- How (not) to protect genomic data privacy in a distributed network: using trail re-identification to evaluate and design anonymity protection systemsJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2004
- Balancing rigour and acceptability: the use of HIV incidence to evaluate a community-based randomised trial in rural UgandaSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2002