Sex–specific effects of carotenoid intake on the immunological response to allografts in guppies (Poecilia reticulata)
Open Access
- 7 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 271 (1534), 45-49
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2526
Abstract
Rarely are the evolutionary origins of mate preferences known, but, recently, the preference of female guppies (Poecilia reticulata) for males with carotenoid‐based sexual coloration has been linked to a sensory bias that may have originally evolved for detecting carotenoid‐rich fruits. If carotenoids enhance the immune systems of these fishes, as has been suggested for other species, this could explain the origin of the attraction to orange fruits as well as the maintenance of the female preference for orange males. We used the classic immunological technique of tissue grafting to assay a component of the immune response of guppies raised on two different dietary levels of carotenoids. Individual scales were transplanted between pairs of unrelated fishes, creating reciprocal allografts. Transplanted scales were scored on a six‐point rejection scale every day for 10 days. Five days later, the same pairs of fishes received a second set of allografts and were scored again. Compared with low‐carotenoid‐diet males, high‐carotenoid‐diet males mounted a significantly stronger rejection response to the second allograft but not to the first allograft. High‐carotenoid‐diet females, however, showed no improvement in graft rejection compared with low‐carotenoid‐diet females. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental evidence for sex‐specific effects of carotenoid consumption on the immune system of a species with carotenoid‐based sexual coloration. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the mate preference for carotenoid coloration is maintained by the benefits to females of choosing healthy mates, but they cast doubt on the idea that the benefits of carotenoid consumption, per se, could account for the origin of the preference. The sex‐specificity of carotenoid effects on allograft rejection in guppies provides indirect support for the general hypothesis that males pay an immunological cost for sexual ornamentation.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Marginal Differentiation between the Sexual and General Carotenoid Pigmentation of Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) and a Possible Visual ExplanationPhysiological and Biochemical Zoology, 2003
- Immune Activation Rapidly Mirrored in a Secondary Sexual TraitScience, 2003
- CAROTENOID LIMITATION AND MATE PREFERENCE EVOLUTION: A TEST OF THE INDICATOR HYPOTHESIS IN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA)Evolution, 2000
- Histocompatibility analysis of clonal diversity in unisexual hybrids of the killifishesFundulus heteroclitusandFundulus diaphanusCanadian Journal of Zoology, 2000
- Is There an Immunological Cost to Carotenoid‐Based Ornamental Coloration?The American Naturalist, 1999
- Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence HandicapThe American Naturalist, 1992
- Truth in Advertising: The Kinds of Traits Favored by Sexual SelectionThe American Naturalist, 1984
- Heritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: A Role for Parasites?Science, 1982
- THE EFFECTS OF ANTIBIOTICS AND X-IRRADIATION ON THE SURVIVAL OF SCALE HOMOGRAFTS IN FUNDULUS HETEROCLITUSTransplantation, 1964
- SCALE HOMOTRANSPLANTATION IN GOLDFISH (CARASSIUS AURATUS)Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1957