Researching the mental health needs of hard-to-reach groups: managing multiple sources of evidence
Open Access
- 10 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 9 (1), 226
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-226
Abstract
Background: Common mental health problems impose substantial challenges to patients, carers, and health care systems. A range of interventions have demonstrable efficacy in improving the lives of people experiencing such problems. However many people are disadvantaged, either because they are unable to access primary care, or because access does not lead to adequate help. New methods are needed to understand the problems of access and generate solutions. In this paper we describe our methodological approach to managing multiple and diverse sources of evidence, within a research programme to increase equity of access to high quality mental health services in primary care. Methods: We began with a scoping review to identify the range and extent of relevant published material, and establish key concepts related to access. We then devised a strategy to collect - in parallel - evidence from six separate sources: a systematic review of published quantitative data on access-related studies; a meta-synthesis of published qualitative data on patient perspectives; dialogues with local stakeholders; a review of grey literature from statutory and voluntary service providers; secondary analysis of patient transcripts from previous qualitative studies; and primary data from interviews with service users and carers. We synthesised the findings from these diverse sources, made judgements on key emerging issues in relation to needs and services, and proposed a range of potential interventions. These proposals were debated and refined using iterative electronic and focus group consultation procedures involving international experts, local stakeholders and service users. Conclusions: Our methods break new ground by generating and synthesising multiple sources of evidence, connecting scientific understanding with the perspectives of users, in order to develop innovative ways to meet the mental health needs of under-served groups.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process TheorySociology, 2009
- What Do Patients Choose to Tell Their Doctors? Qualitative Analysis of Potential Barriers to Reattributing Medically Unexplained SymptomsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Developing guided self-help for depression using the Medical Research Council complex interventions framework: a description of the modelling phase and results of an exploratory randomised controlled trialBMC Psychiatry, 2008
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- Should Muslims have faith based health services?BMJ, 2007
- Developing a U.K. protocol for collaborative care: a qualitative studyGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 2006
- The case for psychological treatment centresBMJ, 2006
- Homelessness and Mental Illness: A Literature Review and a Qualitative Study of Perceptions of the Adequacy of CareInternational Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2006
- Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventionsJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Uncovering the Limits of Patient-Centeredness: Implementing a Self-Management Trial for Chronic IllnessQualitative Health Research, 2005