Developing and validating a model to predict the success of an IHCS implementation: the Readiness for Implementation Model
- 1 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 17 (6), 707-713
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.005546
Abstract
To develop and validate the Readiness for Implementation Model (RIM). This model predicts a healthcare organization's potential for success in implementing an interactive health communication system (IHCS). The model consists of seven weighted factors, with each factor containing five to seven elements. Two decision-analytic approaches, self-explicated and conjoint analysis, were used to measure the weights of the RIM with a sample of 410 experts. The RIM model with weights was then validated in a prospective study of 25 IHCS implementation cases. Orthogonal main effects design was used to develop 700 conjoint-analysis profiles, which varied on seven factors. Each of the 410 experts rated the importance and desirability of the factors and their levels, as well as a set of 10 different profiles. For the prospective 25-case validation, three time-repeated measures of the RIM scores were collected for comparison with the implementation outcomes. Two of the seven factors, 'organizational motivation' and 'meeting user needs,' were found to be most important in predicting implementation readiness. No statistically significant difference was found in the predictive validity of the two approaches (self-explicated and conjoint analysis). The RIM was a better predictor for the 1-year implementation outcome than the half-year outcome. The expert sample, the order of the survey tasks, the additive model, and basing the RIM cut-off score on experience are possible limitations of the study. The RIM needs to be empirically evaluated in institutions adopting IHCS and sustaining the system in the long term.Keywords
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- The influence of context and process when implementing e-healthBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2009
- Development and Implementation of a Clinician Reporting System for Advanced Stage Cancer: Initial Lessons LearnedJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2008
- Conjoint analysis for environmental evaluationEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research, 2008
- Unintended Consequences of Information Technologies in Health Care--An Interactive Sociotechnical AnalysisJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2007
- Physicians and Nurses Focus on Different Aspects of Guidelines When Deciding Whether to Adopt Them: An Application of Conjoint AnalysisMedical Decision Making, 2007
- Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic diseaseCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005
- Using information technology for patient education: realizing surplus value?Patient Education and Counseling, 2004
- The Use of Conjoint-Analysis for Measuring Preferences in Supply Chain DesignIndustrial Marketing Management, 2000
- Assessment of a computerized medical record system: disclosing scripts of useEvaluation and Program Planning, 1999
- Will the disadvantaged ride the information highway? Hopeful answers from a computer‐based health crisis systemJournal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 1996