Modeling correlated main‐chain motions in proteins for flexible molecular recognition
- 11 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Vol. 57 (2), 243-261
- https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20179
Abstract
We describe a new method for modeling protein and ligand main‐chain flexibility, and show its ability to model flexible molecular recognition. The goal is to sample the full conformational space, including large‐scale motions that typically cannot be reached in molecular dynamics simulations due to the computational intensity, as well as conformations that have not been observed yet by crystallography or NMR. A secondary goal is to assess the degree of flexibility consistent with protein–ligand recognition. Flexibility analysis of the target protein is performed using the graph‐theoretic algorithm FIRST, which also identifies coupled networks of covalent and noncovalent bonds within the protein. The available conformations of the flexible regions are then explored with ROCK by random‐walk sampling of the rotatable bonds. ROCK explores correlated motions by only sampling dihedral angles that preserve the coupled bond networks in the protein and generates conformers with good stereochemistry, without using a computationally expensive potential function. A representative set of the conformational ensemble generated this way can be used as targets for docking with SLIDE, which handles the flexibility of protein and ligand side‐chains. The realism of this protein main‐chain conformational sampling is assessed by comparison with time‐resolved NMR studies of cyclophilin A motions. ROCK is also effective for modeling the flexibility of large cyclic and polycyclic ligands, as demonstrated for cyclosporin and zearalenol. The use of this combined approach to perform docking with main‐chain flexibility is illustrated for the cyclophilin A–cyclosporin complex and the estrogen receptor in complex with zearalenol, while addressing the question of how much flexibility is allowed without hindering molecular recognition. Proteins 2004.Keywords
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Change in protein flexibility upon complex formation: Analysis of Ras‐Raf using molecular dynamics and a molecular framework approachProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2004
- Increased Backbone Mobility in β-Barrel Enhances Entropy Gain Driving Binding of N-TIMP-1 to MMP-3Journal of Molecular Biology, 2003
- Two-State Allosteric Behavior in a Single-Domain Signaling ProteinScience, 2001
- Side-chain flexibility in proteins upon ligand bindingProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2000
- Increased protein backbone conformational entropy upon hydrophobic ligand binding.Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 1999
- The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase.Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 1999
- Conformational substates in enzyme mechanism: The 120 K structure of α‐lytic protease at 1.5 Å resolutionProtein Science, 1997
- Changes in the NMR-Derived Motional Parameters of the Insulin Receptor Substrate 1 Phosphotyrosine Binding Domain upon Binding to an Interleukin 4 Receptor PhosphopeptideBiochemistry, 1997
- Backbone Dynamics of the C-Terminal Domain of Escherichia coli Topoisomerase I in the Absence and Presence of Single-Stranded DNABiochemistry, 1996
- Conformational Substates in ProteinsAnnual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, 1988