Design and rationale of the RadIal Vs. femorAL access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: A randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes
- 28 February 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 161 (2), 254-260.e4
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.021
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dose Comparisons of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Coronary SyndromesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Choice of arterial access site and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes managed with an early invasive strategy: the ACUITY trialEuroIntervention, 2009
- Improving clinical outcomes by reducing bleeding in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromesEuropean Heart Journal, 2008
- Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg)Heart, 2008
- Bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing early invasive management can be reduced with radial access, smaller sheath sizes, and timely sheath removalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2006
- Bivalirudin for Patients with Acute Coronary SyndromesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Adverse Impact of Bleeding on Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary SyndromesCirculation, 2006
- Comparison of Fondaparinux and Enoxaparin in Acute Coronary SyndromesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Impact of Bleeding Severity on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Coronary SyndromesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Coronary angiography from the radial artery – experience, complications and limitationsInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1998