Glycated Hemoglobin Measurement and Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease
Open Access
- 26 March 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 311 (12), 1225-1233
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.1873
Abstract
To help achieve reductions in diabetes-specific microvascular complications, guidelines recommend screening people for diabetes mellitus by assessing glycemia measures, such as fasting blood glucose levels and levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), a measure of glucose exposure over the previous 2 to 3 months.1,2 Furthermore, because higher levels of glycemia measures have also been associated with higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence,3,4 it has been proposed that including information on glycemia measures in algorithms used to predict the risk of CVD might be associated with improvements in the ability to predict CVD.5-7This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2012 Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dyslipidemia for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the AdultCanadian Journal of Cardiology, 2013
- Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 2012
- C-Reactive Protein, Fibrinogen, and Cardiovascular Disease PredictionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Low Glycated Hemoglobin and Liver Disease in the U.S. PopulationDiabetes Care, 2011
- A1C Versus Glucose Testing: A ComparisonDiabetes Care, 2011
- Statistical methods for assessment of added usefulness of new biomarkerscclm, 2010
- Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studiesThe Lancet, 2010
- Statistical methods for the time-to-event analysis of individual participant data from multiple epidemiological studiesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Glycated Hemoglobin, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Risk in Nondiabetic AdultsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002