Risk, Control and Gender: Reconciling Production and Reproduction in the Risk Society
- 1 February 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Organization Studies
- Vol. 30 (2-3), 205-226
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608101477
Abstract
In the risk society, managing health risks underlines a social tension between a logic of rationalization and a logic of subjectivation. In the former, techno-scientific thought dominates and induces a certain form of dependence on scientific experts while, in the latter, the individuals tend to be seen to make independent choices to protect their health. This article examines the logics of the actors in the risk management process from a constructivist perspective. According to Dubet's sociology of experience, social experience is structured around three logics: the logic of integration, i.e. the social world seen through the membership group, role and social relations; the strategic logic, i.e. the social world seen as a market; and the logic of subjectivation, i.e. the ability to be a subject, to distance oneself from the surrounding world and to give meaning to one's actions and decisions. Our qualitative research involved the analysis of the discourse of workers and employers in relation to the risk for pregnancy of work activities. The study was conducted in Quebec (Canada), where employers are legally obliged to protect the health of pregnant workers and the latter have the right to safe working conditions without prejudice. The results show that scientific experts do not have a determining impact on organizational changes and the representations of risk held by employers and women workers. Scientific controversies about work risks for pregnancy are used by employers to maintain the status quo while, for workers, the climate of employment and economic insecurity plays a significant role in how they deal with work-related health risks. Based on the theory of the risk society, the results bring out the complex interplay between scientific rationality and social rationality whereby risk is defined according to the interests of the actors involved. But, not consistent with certain tenets of the risk society thesis, they also reveal one's ability to be critical of institutionalized risk.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- L’analyse par théorisation ancréeCahiers de recherche sociologique, 2011
- Intermittent Work and Well-BeingCurrent Sociology, 2007
- Book Review: Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political ConsequencesJournal of Sociology, 2003
- `Risk is Part of Your Life': Risk Epistemologies Among a Group of AustraliansSociology, 2002
- Production and Reproduction: The Issues Involved in Reconciling Work and PregnancyNEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 2002
- Blurring the boundaries: breastfeeding and maternal subjectivitySociology of Health & Illness, 2001
- A multilevel analysis of organisational factors related to the taking of safety initiatives by work groupsSafety Science, 1995
- Risk as Moral Danger: The Social and Political Functions of Risk Discourse in Public HealthInternational Journal of Health Services, 1993
- Reflexive Modernization: The Aesthetic DimensionTheory, Culture & Society, 1993
- On the epistemology of risk: Language, logic and social scienceSocial Science & Medicine, 1992