A measure for describing and comparing postreproductive life span as a population trait
Open Access
- 1 March 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Vol. 2 (5), 446-453
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00095.x
Abstract
1. While classical life‐history theory does not predict postreproductive life span (PRLS), it has been detected in a great number of taxa, leading to the view that it is a broadly conserved trait and attempts to reconcile theory with these observations. We suggest an alternative: the apparently wide distribution of significant PRLS is an artefact of insufficient methods. 2. PRLS is traditionally measured in units of time between each individual’s last parturition and death, after excluding those individuals for whom this interval is short. A mean of this measure is then calculated as a population value. We show this traditional population measure (which we denote PrT) to be inconsistently calculated, inherently biased, strongly correlated with overall longevity, uninformative on the importance of PRLS in a population’s life history, unable to use the most commonly available form of relevant data and without a realistic null hypothesis. Using data altered to ensure that the null hypothesis is true, we find a false‐positive rate of 0·47 for PrT. 3. We propose an alternative population measure, using life‐table methods. Postreproductive representation (PrR) is the proportion of adult years lived which are postreproductive. We briefly derive PrR and discuss its properties. We employ a demographic simulation, based on the null hypothesis of simultaneous and proportional decline in survivorship and fecundity, to produce a null distribution for PrR based on the age‐specific rates of a population. 4. In an example analysis, using data on 84 populations of human and nonhuman primates, we demonstrate the ability of PrR to represent the effects of artificial protection from mortality and of humanness on PRLS. PrR is found to be higher for all human populations under a wide range of conditions than for any nonhuman primate in our sample. A strong effect of artificial protection is found, but humans under the most adverse conditions still achieve PrR of >0·3. 5. PrT should not be used as a population measure and should be used as an individual measure only with great caution. The use of PrR as an intuitive, statistically valid and intercomparable population life‐history measure is encouraged.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Grandmothering and natural selectionProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2010
- The evolution of menopause in cetaceans and humans: the role of demographyProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2010
- The role of menopause and reproductive senescence in a long-lived social mammalFrontiers in Zoology, 2009
- Sociality, selection, and survival: Simulated evolution of mortality with intergenerational transfers and food sharingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Reproductive conflict and the separation of reproductive generations in humansProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Mortality rate acceleration and post-reproductive lifespan in matrilineal whale speciesBiology Letters, 2008
- Predation by Bears Drives Senescence in Natural Populations of SalmonPLOS ONE, 2007
- Why Men Matter: Mating Patterns Drive Evolution of Human LifespanPLOS ONE, 2007
- Eusociality, menopause and information in matrilineal whalesTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2005
- The Evolution of Senescence and Post-Reproductive Lifespan in Guppies (Poecilia reticulata)PLoS Biology, 2005