Reproducibility of blood pressure variability, white‐coat effect and dipping pattern in untreated, uncomplicated and newly diagnosed essential hypertension
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Blood Pressure
- Vol. 13 (4), 214-224
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08037050410021432
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the reproducibility of blood pressure (BP) variability, white‐coat effect (WCE) and nocturnal dipping pattern in untreated patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension using 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Methods: Seventy‐five newly diagnosed, untreated essential hypertensive subjects (54 men, 21 women 47.6 ± 9.3 years) were recruited for the study based on conventional measured BP from a total of 180 patients referred for ABPM. Of these, 65 patients underwent repeated ABPM after 4 weeks observation without treatment. Reproducibility of BP, nocturnal dipping pattern, WCE and BP variability were assessed using different methods. Results: The average 24‐hour BP (140.8 ± 11.9/91.8 ± 6.4 vs. 140.5 ± 14.5/90.7 ± 7.6 mmHg, ns) or PP (49.6 ± 10.8 vs. 49.8 ± 9.8 mmHg, ns) did not change, nor did daytime BP or PP. The WCE diminished significantly during the observation period (reduction in SBP WCE Δ8.2 ± 12.5 mmHg, p < 0.0001, in DBP WCE, Δ3.3 ± 9.2 mmHg, p = 0.008 and in PP WCE Δ4.8 ± 11.2 mmHg, p = 0.002). Variability in SBP, DBP and PP decreased consistently and significantly during the observation period. The nocturnal dipping pattern was unchanged in 82% of the patients. In 12% non‐dipping pattern was converted to dipping pattern after repeated measurement. Conclusion: Average ABPs are highly reproducible in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension of limited duration. Similarly, nocturnal dipping pattern reproduced satisfactorily. These measures have important clinical applicability. The white‐coat effect as well as variability are greatly attenuated during repeated measurements, and these measures may thus be of less utility in clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- White coat hypertension: not so benign after all?Journal of Human Hypertension, 2003
- Self measured and ambulatory blood pressure in assessing the ‘white-coat’ phenomenonJournal Of Hypertension, 2003
- White coat effectJournal of Hypertension, 2003
- What is the white-coat effect and how should it be measured?Blood Pressure Monitoring, 2002
- Blood Pressure Variability and Organ Damage in a General PopulationHypertension, 2002
- Difference between office and ambulatory blood pressure or real white coat effectJournal of Hypertension, 2000
- Attenuation of the “White-Coat Effect” by Antihypertensive Treatment and Regression of Target Organ DamageHypertension, 2000
- Paper alertBlood Pressure Monitoring, 1999
- Reproducibility of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Reduction Rate and the Prevalence of "Non-Dippers" Using 48-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients with Essential HypertensionAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1996
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986