The Importance of Carbon Footprint Estimation Boundaries
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Science & Technology
- Vol. 42 (16), 5839-5842
- https://doi.org/10.1021/es703112w
Abstract
Because of increasing concern about global climate change and carbon emissions as a causal factor, many companies and organizations are pursuing “carbon footprint” projects to estimate their own contributions to global climate change. Protocol definitions from carbon registries help organizations analyze their footprints. The scope of these protocols varies but generally suggests estimating only direct emissions and emissions from purchased energy, with less focus on supply chain emissions. In contrast, approaches based on comprehensive environmental life-cycle assessment methods are available to track total emissions across the entire supply chain, and experience suggests that following narrowly defined estimation protocols will generally lead to large underestimates of carbon emissions for providing products and services. Direct emissions from an industry are, on average, only 14% of the total supply chain carbon emissions (often called Tier 1 emissions), and direct emissions plus industry energy inputs are, on average, only 26% of the total supply chain emissions (often called Tier 1 and 2 emissions). Without a full knowledge of their footprints, firms will be unable to pursue the most cost-effective carbon mitigation strategies. We suggest that firms use the screening-level analysis described here to set the bounds of their footprinting strategy to ensure that they do not ignore large sources of environmental effects across their supply chains. Such information can help firms pursue carbon and environmental emission mitigation projects not only within their own plants but also across their supply chain.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Embodied Environmental Emissions in U.S. International Trade, 1997−2004Environmental Science & Technology, 2007
- Climate Change 2007Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2007
- Shared producer and consumer responsibility — Theory and practiceEcological Economics, 2006
- System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid ApproachesEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2003
- Input‐Output Analysis of Waste ManagementJournal of Industrial Ecology, 2002
- CO2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility?Energy Policy, 2001
- Environmental and Economic Effects of E-Commerce: A Case Study of Book Publishing and Retail LogisticsTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001
- SpeakoutIEEE Spectrum, 2000
- Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle InventoriesJournal of Industrial Ecology, 2000
- National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint conceptEcological Economics, 1999