A meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in multivessel coronary artery disease
- 15 November 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 76 (14), 1025-1029
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80289-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Coronary Angioplasty with Coronary Bypass SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A Randomized Study of Coronary Angioplasty Compared with Bypass Surgery in Patients with Symptomatic Multivessel Coronary DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists CollaborationThe Lancet, 1994
- Coronary angioplasty versus left internal mammary artery grafting for isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosisThe Lancet, 1994
- Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty.Circulation, 1994
- Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): In-hospital results and 1-year follow-upJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- A Comparison of Directional Atherectomy with Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trialThe Lancet, 1993
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Nonoperative Dilatation of Coronary-Artery StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979