Heated, Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy: Yet Another Way to Deliver Continuous Positive Airway Pressure?
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in PEDIATRICS
- Vol. 121 (1), 82-88
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-0957
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The goal was to estimate the level of delivered continuous positive airway pressure by measuring oral cavity pressure with the mouth closed in infants of various weights and ages treated with heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula at flow rates of 1–5 L/minute. We hypothesized that clinically relevant levels of continuous positive airway pressure would not be achieved if a nasal leak is maintained.METHODS. After performing bench measurements and demonstrating that oral cavity pressure closely approximated levels of traditionally applied nasal continuous positive airway pressure, we successfully measured oral cavity pressure during heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula treatment in 27 infants. Small (outer diameter: 0.2 cm) cannulae were used for all infants, and flow rates were left as ordered by providers.RESULTS. Bench measurements showed that, for any given leak size, there was a nearly linear relationship between flow rate and pressure. The highest pressure achieved was 4.5 cmH2O (flow rate: 8 L/minute; leak: 3 mm). In our study infants (postmenstrual age: 29.1–44.7 weeks; weight: 835–3735 g; flow rate: 1–5 L/minute), no pressure was generated with the mouth open at any flow rate. With the mouth closed, the oral cavity pressure was related to both flow rate and weight. For infants of ≤1500 g, there was a linear relationship between flow rate and oral cavity pressure.CONCLUSIONS. Oral cavity pressure can estimate the level of continuous positive airway pressure. Continuous positive airway pressure generated with heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula treatment depends on the flow rate and weight. Only in the smallest infants with the highest flow rates, with the mouth fully closed, can clinically significant but unpredictable levels of continuous positive airway pressure be achieved. We conclude that heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula should not be used as a replacement for delivering continuous positive airway pressure.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective studyJournal of Perinatology, 2007
- Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for preterm infantsJournal of Perinatology, 2006
- Work of breathing using high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infantsJournal of Perinatology, 2006
- Nasal Cannula Use in the Preterm Infant: Oxygen or Pressure?PEDIATRICS, 2005
- Use of Oxygen Cannulas in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants is Associated with Mucosal Trauma and Bleeding, and Possibly with Coagulase-negative Staphylococcal SepsisJournal of Perinatology, 2003
- CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSUREPublished by Elsevier BV ,2003
- Newer experience with CPAPSeminars in Neonatology, 2002
- High-Flow Nasal Cannulae in the Management of Apnea of Prematurity: A Comparison With Conventional Nasal Continuous Positive Airway PressurePEDIATRICS, 2001
- Low inspired gas temperature and respiratory complications in very low birth weight infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1989
- A review of the mechanisms and methods of humidification of inspired gasesIntensive Care Medicine, 1988