Work-First or Work-Only: Welfare Reform, State Policy, and Access to Postsecondary Education
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
- Vol. 586 (1), 144-171
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399702250212
Abstract
As a result of the 1996 welfare reform—Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF)—the number of welfare recipients enrolled in postsecondary education has decreased dramatically. The new welfare law also gives states significant discretion to support and even promote postsecondary education for low-income adults; consequently, state policies regarding access vary widely. This study uses qualitative data from three states to examine the sources and consequences of state variation in access to postsecondary education for disadvantaged individuals. Our cross-state comparison shows that competing ideas about welfare, work and the role of education in the lives of welfare recipients help structure and shape political debates, and policy outcomes, in the each of the states. Ideas influenced policies via four key channels: the state human service agency; advocacy organizations; the persistence of the “work-first” idea within implementation processes; and the power of policy “signals” to drive state welfare reform.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- No Rookies on RookiesThe Journal of Higher Education, 2001
- Packaging Support for Low‐Income Families: Policy Variation across the United StatesJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2001
- Achieving Goal Congruencein Complex Environments: The Case of Welfare ReformJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2001
- ‘These are your Title I students’: Policy language in educational practicePolicy Sciences, 2001
- Inside the Welfare Contract: Discretion and Accountability in State Welfare AdministrationSocial Service Review, 1997
- Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy AgendasPolitical Science Quarterly, 1989
- Paradigms and Political Discourse: Protective Legislation in France and the United States Before 1914Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1989