Enforcing Rules on Related Party Transactions in Italy: One Securities Regulator's Challenge
Preprint
- 31 May 2018
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier BV in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
In the wake of the corporate scandals of the early 2000s, Italian policymakers tackled tunnelling via related party transactions (RPTs) by enacting a three-layer regime: a statute setting the goals of a regulation (transparency, and substantial and procedural fairness of RPTs); a regulation enacted by the financial markets authority (Consob), which defines the “principles” for achieving those goals; and individual companies’ internal codes which implement those principles. As a consequence of that approach, Consob was entrusted with two challenging functions: first, to spell out those principles and, second, to enforce the new regime. Consob designed a flexible regulatory framework where, in addition to a set of mandatory provisions, various default ones and some opt-in rules were made available. The core provisions, on the one hand, require immediate disclosure on material transactions to improve market scrutiny, and, on the other, bolster internal governance mechanisms, by granting independent directors veto power on material RPTs. As for Consob’s role in enforcement, which is the focus of this chapter, we first describe the formal and informal powers that Consob can use to prevent tunnelling via RPTs and how, in the first years after the RPT Regulation came into force, Consob prioritized such goals both in its strategic plans and its internal organization choices. Then, we report two cases to illustrate how the regulator’s timely action, particularly requests for additional disclosure, can encourage companies to adopt better practices and improve RPT terms. At the same time, the analysis of substantial issues (e.g. if the RPT is substantially fair) has made actual enforcement trickier, leading Consob to prefer soft rather than formal powers. Our tale, though, has no happy ending. We show how, after a few years of zealous enforcement of the RPT rules, Consob has become less aggressive in its (somewhat isolated) fight against tunnelling.This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Svetlana Gorshenina, Asie CentraleCahiers du monde russe, 2012
- Corporate Governance Reforms in Italy: What Has Been Done and What Is Left to DoEuropean Business Organization Law Review (EBOR), 2009
- Public and private enforcement of securities laws: Resource-based evidenceJournal of Financial Economics, 2009
- Conservare il guacamole come appena fattoPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2009
- Unbundling and Measuring TunnelingSSRN Electronic Journal, 2008
- Financial Scandals and the Role of Private Enforcement: The Parmalat CaseSSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- Controlling Controlling ShareholdersUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2003
- Do Corporate Law Judges Matter? Some Evidence from MilanEuropean Business Organization Law Review (EBOR), 2002
- Intrinsically incoherentScience, 1998
- Binding assayScience, 1998