Early Warning Scores Generated in Developed Healthcare Settings Are Not Sufficient at Predicting Early Mortality in Blantyre, Malawi: A Prospective Cohort Study
Open Access
- 29 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (3), e59830
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059830
Abstract
Early warning scores (EWS) are widely used in well-resourced healthcare settings to identify patients at risk of mortality. The Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) is a well-known EWS used comprehensively in the United Kingdom. The HOTEL score (Hypotension, Oxygen saturation, Temperature, ECG abnormality, Loss of independence) was developed and tested in a European cohort; however, its validity is unknown in resource limited settings. This study compared the performance of both scores and suggested modifications to enhance accuracy. A prospective cohort study of adults (≥18 yrs) admitted to medical wards at a Malawian hospital. Primary outcome was mortality within three days. Performance of MEWS and HOTEL were assessed using ROC analysis. Logistic regression analysis identified important predictors of mortality and from this a new score was defined. Three-hundred-and-two patients were included. Fifty-one (16.9%) died within three days of admission. With a cut-point ≥2, the HOTEL score had sensitivity 70.6% (95% CI: 56.2 to 82.5) and specificity 59.4% (95% CI: 53.0 to 65.5), and was superior to MEWS (cut-point ≥5); sensitivity: 58.8% (95% CI: 44.2 to 72.4), specificity: 56.2% (95% CI: 49.8 to 62.4). The new score, dubbed TOTAL (Tachypnoea, Oxygen saturation, Temperature, Alert, Loss of independence), showed slight improvement with a cut-point ≥2; sensitivity 76.5% (95% CI: 62.5 to 87.2) and specificity 67.3% (95% CI: 61.1 to 73.1). Using an EWS generated in developed healthcare systems in resource limited settings results in loss of sensitivity and specificity. A score based on predictors of mortality specific to the Malawian population showed enhanced accuracy but not enough to warrant clinical use. Despite an assumption of common physiological responses, disease and population differences seem to strongly determine the performance of EWS. Local validation and impact assessment of these scores should precede their adoption in resource limited settings.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ischaemic heart disease in AfricaHeart, 2008
- The Cape Triage Score -- a triage system for South Africa.2006
- The prevalence of recordings of the signs of critical conditions and emergency responses in hospital wards—the SOCCER studyResuscitation, 2005
- Autoimmune inflammatory disorders, systemic corticosteroids and pneumocystis pneumonia: A strategy for preventionBMC Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Association between clinically abnormal observations and subsequent in-hospital mortality: a prospective studyResuscitation, 2004
- The critically ill: following your MEWS.QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissionsQJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Triage in the developing world---can it be done?Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2001
- Development and technical basis of simplified guidelines for emergency triage assessment and treatment in developing countriesArchives of Disease in Childhood, 1999
- Integrated approach to child health in developing countriesThe Lancet, 1999