The Good City
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Studies
- Vol. 43 (5-6), 1009-1023
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600676717
Abstract
Can the contemporary city qualify as the topos of the good life, as it has in classical literature on human emancipation? As geographical entities, cities are hardly discernible places with distinct identities. They have become an endless inhabited sprawl without clear boundaries and they have become sites of extraordinary circulation and translocal connectivity. Similarly, sociologically, contemporary cities do not spring to mind as the sites of community and well-being. For the vast majority of people, cities are polluted, unhealthy, tiring, overwhelming, confusing, alienating. Politically, too, the contemporary city bears little resemblance to imaginings of the times when urbanism stood for citizenship, the ideal republic, good government, civic behaviour and the ideal public sphere. The politics of emancipation with a big 'P' is no longer a particularly urban affair in either genesis or practice, having given way to national and global institutions and movements. What remains of the urban as demos in these circumstances? At one level, clearly very little, as one instance in a wider demos or demon that pulls in many directions. This said, the urban remains an enormously significant formative arena, not only as the daily space of over half of the world's population, but also as the supremely visible manifestation of difference and heterogeneity placed together. Urbanism highlights the challenges of negotiating class, gender and ethnic or racial differences placed in close proximity. It also profiles the newness that arises from spatial juxtaposition and global flow and connectivity, forever forcing responses of varying type and intensity in the face of negotiating strangers, strangeness and continuous change. Possibilities thus remain for continuing to ask about the nature of the 'good city'. This paper outlines the elements of an urban ethic imagined as an ever-widening habit of solidarity built around different dimensions of the urban common weal. It offers a practical urban utopianism based around four registers of solidarity woven around the collective basics of everyday urban life. These are 'repair', 'relatedness', 'rights' and 're-enchantment'.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- "Transcending Without Transcendence": Utopianism and an Ethos of HopeAntipode, 2006
- But malice aforethought: cities and the natural history of hatredTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2005
- Towards the Relational Construction of Militant Particularisms: Or Why the Geographies of Past Struggles Matter for Resistance to Neoliberal GlobalisationAntipode, 2005
- What's Left? Just the FutureAntipode, 2005
- Questioning the use of ‘local democracy’ as a discursive strategy for political mobilization in Los Angeles, Montreal and TorontoInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2003
- Utopia with no ToposHistory of the Human Sciences, 2003
- In defence of utopian urbanism: imagining cities after the ‘end of utopia’Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 2002
- From Urban Entrepreneurialism to a “Revanchist City”? On the Spatial Injustices of Glasgow’s RenaissanceAntipode, 2002
- Seceding from Responsibility? Secession Movements in Los AngelesUrban Studies, 2001
- The Good City: In Defense of Utopian ThinkingInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2000