From psych verbs to nouns
- 7 June 2012
- book chapter
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP)
Abstract
The Aspect Preservation Hypothesis (APH) predicts that, all things being equal, the aspectual information of a deverbal nominalization reflects the Aktionsart of the verbal base. This hypothesis faces prima facie counterexamples in the domain of psychological nouns, as they quite systematically denote states, while not all psychological verbs are stative. This chapter addresses these counterexamples and argues that they do not pose a problem for the APH. We argue that the base of the nominalization is a partially specified verbal stem; then we show that only verbs whose stem is stative have a derived psychological noun. Verbs whose stem is not stative lack a corresponding nominalization, although they can be associated with an underived psychological noun.Keywords
This publication has 100 references indexed in Scilit:
- Productive reduplication in a fundamentally monosyllabic languageLanguage Sciences, 2009
- ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentencesBrain and Language, 2009
- Hyponymous objects and Late InsertionLingua, 2009
- Event SegmentationCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2007
- Event perception: A mind-brain perspective.Psychological Bulletin, 2007
- Event visibility in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)Sign Language & Linguistics, 2006
- The Lexicon-Syntax Parameter: Reflexivization and Other Arity OperationsLinguistic Inquiry, 2005
- Some Unfinished Thoughts on FINISHSign Language & Linguistics, 1999
- The different readings of wieder 'again': a structural accountJournal of Semantics, 1996
- Secondary resultative predicates in ItalianJournal of Linguistics, 1992