Complication Reporting in Orthopaedic Trials
- 1 August 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Vol. 91 (8), 1847-1853
- https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.h.01455
Abstract
Background: The nature and frequency of complications during or after orthopaedic interventions represent critical clinical information for safety evaluations, which are required for the development or improvement of orthopaedic care. The goal of this systematic review was to check whether essential data regarding the assessment of the prevalence, severity, and characteristics of complications related to orthopaedic interventions are consistently provided by the authors of papers on randomized controlled trials. Methods: Five major peer-reviewed orthopaedic journals were screened for randomized controlled trials published between January 2006 and July 2007. All relevant papers were obtained, anonymized, and evaluated by two external reviewers. A checklist consisting of three main parts (definition, evaluation, and reporting) was developed and applied for the assessment of complication reporting. The results were stratified into surgical and nonsurgical categories. Results: One hundred and twelve randomized controlled trials were identified. Although complications were included as trial outcomes in two-thirds of the studies, clear definitions of anticipated complications were provided in only eight trials. In 83% of the trials, the person or group assessing the complications was not identified. No trial involved a data safety review board for assessment and classification of complications. Conclusions: The lack of homogeneity among the published studies that we reviewed indicates that improvement in the reporting of complications in orthopaedic clinical trials is necessary. A standardized protocol for assessing and reporting complications should be developed and endorsed by professional organizations and, most importantly, by clinical investigators.This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radiographic and Clinical Comparisons of Distal Tibia Shaft Fractures (4 to 11 cm Proximal to the Plafond): Plating Versus Intramedullary NailingJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2008
- Publication Bias in Orthopaedic Research: An Analysis of Scientific Factors Associated with Publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume)Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2008
- Commercially Funded and United States-Based Research Is More Likely to Be Published; Good-Quality Studies with Negative Outcomes Are NotThe Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2007
- A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patientsThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2007
- Nutritional Supplementation Decreases Hip Fracture-related ComplicationsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2006
- Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: A Systematic Review of 69 Clinical StudiesSpine, 2006
- Skin protection underneath the pneumatic tourniquet during total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial of 92 patientsActa Orthopaedica, 2006
- Should Insertion of Intramedullary Nails for Tibial Fractures Be With or Without Reaming?Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2004
- Association Between Funding Source and Study Outcome in Orthopaedic ResearchClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2003
- Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvest Donor Site MorbiditySpine, 1995