Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 31 March 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Physics
- Vol. 45 (4), E53-E83
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12810
Abstract
PurposePatient-specific IMRT QA measurements are important components of processes designed to identify discrepancies between calculated and delivered radiation doses. Discrepancy tolerance limits are neither well defined nor consistently applied across centers. The AAPM TG-218 report provides a comprehensive review aimed at improving the understanding and consistency of these processes as well as recommendations for methodologies and tolerance limits in patient-specific IMRT QA. MethodsThe performance of the dose difference/distance-to-agreement (DTA) and dose distribution comparison metrics are investigated. Measurement methods are reviewed and followed by a discussion of the pros and cons of each. Methodologies for absolute dose verification are discussed and new IMRT QA verification tools are presented. Literature on the expected or achievable agreement between measurements and calculations for different types of planning and delivery systems are reviewed and analyzed. Tests of vendor implementations of the verification algorithm employing benchmark cases are presented. ResultsOperational shortcomings that can reduce the tool accuracy and subsequent effectiveness for IMRT QA are described. Practical considerations including spatial resolution, normalization, dose threshold, and data interpretation are discussed. Published data on IMRT QA and the clinical experience of the group members are used to develop guidelines and recommendations on tolerance and action limits for IMRT QA. Steps to check failed IMRT QA plans are outlined. ConclusionRecommendations on delivery methods, data interpretation, dose normalization, the use of analysis routines and choice of tolerance limits for IMRT QA are made with focus on detecting differences between calculated and measured doses via the use of robust analysis methods and an in-depth understanding of IMRT verification metrics. The recommendations are intended to improve the IMRT QA process and establish consistent, and comparable IMRT QA criteria among institutions.Keywords
This publication has 138 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the accuracy of 3DVH software estimates of dose to virtual ion chamber and film in composite IMRT QAMedical Physics, 2011
- Eight years of IMRT quality assurance with ionization chambers and film dosimetry: experience of the montpellier comprehensive cancer centerRadiation Oncology, 2011
- Quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy: Evaluation and comparison of different dosimetric systemsMedical Physics, 2011
- Experimental validation of a commercial 3D dose verification system for intensity-modulated arc therapiesPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2010
- QA for helical tomotherapy: Report of the AAPM Task Group 148a)Medical Physics, 2010
- Longitudinal study using a diode phantom for helical tomotherapy IMRT QAMedical Physics, 2009
- Challenges in Credentialing Institutions and Participants in Advanced Technology Multi-institutional Clinical TrialsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2008
- Three-dimensional dose verification for intensity modulated radiation therapy using optical CT based polymer gel dosimetryMedical Physics, 2006
- An extensive log‐file analysis of step‐and‐shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy segment delivery errorsMedical Physics, 2004
- Dosimetric properties of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device for verification of dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapyMedical Physics, 2003