Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Detection Tests for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Open Access
- 1 December 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 53 (12), 3738-3749
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01816-15
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) are extensively used in clinical laboratories. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of RADTs for diagnosis of RSV infection and to determine factors associated with accuracy estimates. We searched EMBASE and PubMed for diagnostic-accuracy studies of commercialized RSV RADTs. Studies reporting sensitivity and specificity data compared to a reference standard (reverse transcriptase PCR [RT-PCR], immunofluorescence, or viral culture) were considered. Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, diagnostic-accuracy estimates, and study quality. Accuracy estimates were pooled using bivariate random-effects regression models. Heterogeneity was investigated with prespecified subgroup analyses. Seventy-one articles met inclusion criteria. Overall, RSV RADT pooled sensitivity and specificity were 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76% to 83%) and 97% (95% CI, 96% to 98%), respectively. Positive- and negative-likelihood ratios were 25.5 (95% CI, 18.3 to 35.5) and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.24), respectively. Sensitivity was higher in children (81% [95% CI, 78%, 84%]) than in adults (29% [95% CI, 11% to 48%]). Because of this disparity, further subgroup analyses were restricted to pediatric data (63 studies). Test sensitivity was poorest using RT-PCR as a reference standard and highest using immunofluorescence (74% versus 88%; P < 0.001). Industry-sponsored studies reported significantly higher sensitivity (87% versus 78%; P = 0.01). Our results suggest that the poor sensitivity of RSV RADTs in adults may preclude their use in this population. Furthermore, industry-sponsored studies and those that did not use RT-PCR as a reference standard likely overestimated test sensitivity.Keywords
This publication has 90 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the 3M Rapid Detection Test for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) in Children during the Early Stages of the 2009 RSV SeasonJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011
- Multicenter Study of Clinical Performance of the 3M Rapid Detection RSV TestJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2010
- Global burden of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2010
- Comparison of Viral Isolation and Multiplex Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR for Confirmation of Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Influenza Virus Detection by Antigen ImmunoassaysJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2009
- The Burden of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Young ChildrenThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Prospective Evaluation of Rapid Antigen Tests for Diagnosis of Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Human Metapneumovirus InfectionsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- RespiFinder: a New Multiparameter Test To Differentially Identify Fifteen Respiratory VirusesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- Sensitive Commercial NASBA Assay for the Detection of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Clinical SpecimenPLOS ONE, 2007
- Performance of a Rapid Assay (Binax NOW) for Detection of Respiratory Syncytial Virus at a Children's Hospital over a 3-Year PeriodJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007
- Comparison of Cepheid's Analyte-Specific Reagents with BD Directigen for Detection of Respiratory Syncytial VirusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007