Evaluation of surgical outcomes of retro-rectus versus intraperitoneal reinforcement with bio-prosthetic mesh in the repair of contaminated ventral hernias
- 14 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Hernia
- Vol. 17 (1), 31-35
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0909-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Non–Cross-Linked Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrices for Abdominal Wall ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010
- Impact of mesh positioning on foreign body reaction and collagenous ingrowth in a rabbit model of open incisional hernia repairHernia, 2009
- Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Complicated Ventral Hernia Repair: Does Technique Affect Outcomes?Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2007
- Long‐Term Outcome of 254 Complex Incisional Hernia Repairs Using the Modified Rives‐Stoppa TechniqueWorld Journal of Surgery, 2007
- Repair of Giant Midline Abdominal Wall Hernias: “Components Separation Technique” versus Prosthetic RepairWorld Journal of Surgery, 2007
- Utilization of Human Cadaveric Acellular Dermis for Abdominal Hernia ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2007
- Open Preperitoneal Retrofascial Mesh Repair for Multiply Recurrent Ventral Incisional HerniasJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2006
- Inception and Evolution of the Components Separation Technique: Personal RecollectionsClinics in Plastic Surgery, 2006
- A Comparison of Suture Repair with Mesh Repair for Incisional HerniaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- The treatment of complicated groin and incisional herniasWorld Journal of Surgery, 1989