A Randomized Multicenter Trial of Minimally Invasive Rapid Deployment Versus Conventional Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 99 (1), 17-25
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.09.022
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current trends in aortic valve replacement: development of the rapid deployment EDWARDS INTUITY valve systemExpert Review of Medical Devices, 2013
- Cross-clamp time is an independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in low- and high-risk cardiac patientsInternational Journal of Surgery, 2011
- Minimally-Invasive Valve SurgeryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2010
- Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysisThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2009
- Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations☆European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2008
- Relation between aortic cross-clamp time and mortality — not as straightforward as expected☆European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2008
- Minimal access aortic valve replacement: effects on morbidity and resource utilizationThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2002
- Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized studyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2002
- Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: a prospective study in 120 patientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1999
- Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operationsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996