A Neoclassical Perspective on Budget Deficits
- 1 May 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Vol. 3 (2), 55-72
- https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.2.55
Abstract
Generally speaking, there are three schools of thought concerning the economic effects of budget deficits: Neoclassical, Keynesian, and Ricardian. It is remarkable that from among these three schools of thought, one can find support for every conceivable normative position. Whether one thinks of deficits as good, bad, or irrelevant therefore depends fundamentally on one's choice of a paradigm. Certainly, no single paradigm corresponds exactly to reality. Nevertheless, it is my view that the Neoclassical framework offers the most relevant insights into the economic effects of deficits. The new Administration would do well to focus on the goals of stimulating saving and capital accumulation, and to formulate a policy for gradually reducing permanent deficits.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Everything Neutral?Journal of Political Economy, 1988
- Ricardian Equivalence: An Evaluation of Theory and EvidenceNBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1987
- Liquidity Constraints, Fiscal Policy, and ConsumptionBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1986
- The Strategic Bequest MotiveJournal of Political Economy, 1985
- AGGREGATE CONSUMPTION AND DEFICIT FINANCING: AN ATTEMPT TO SEPARATE PERMANENT FROM TRANSITORY EFFECTSEconomic Inquiry, 1985
- The Role of Intergenerational Transfers in Aggregate Capital AccumulationJournal of Political Economy, 1981
- Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and EvidenceJournal of Political Economy, 1978
- Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?Journal of Political Economy, 1974