Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: Are We Achieving the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) Objectives?
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 115 (2), 232-236
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000154724.00787.49
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether a two-stage auditory brainstem response (ABR) Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) protocol at an academic medical center has been achieving the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) recommendations for screening all infants, diagnosing hearing loss (HL) within 3 months, and instituting intervention within 6 months. Study Design: Retrospective database and chart review in an academic tertiary care hospital. Methods: A 5-year retrospective review of all newborns screened at our medical center between 1997 to 2001 was performed. Screening was performed by multiple in-hospital postnatal sequential ABR with follow-up outpatient ABR for failures. The protocol called for each newborn to receive at least two separate ABR in-hospital screenings before discharge if the newborn failed the initial screening. For those newborns with extended hospital courses, additional ABR screening were performed randomly in attempt to decrease referral rates at time of discharge. Overall screening population capture rate, referral rate, and false-positive rate were calculated. In addition, HL risk factors, age at diagnosis of HL, and age of onset of intervention were obtained. Cost per diagnosis of HL was calculated as well. Results: The total number screened was 17,602. Seventy-eight (0.44%) were diagnosed with HL, with 62 (79%) in the high-risk population. The frequency of HL was 1 per 811 low-risk neonates versus 1 in 75 meeting high-risk criteria. Overall population capture rate was greater than 99%, referral rate 4.1%, and false-positive rate 3.6%. Mean age at diagnosis was 3.9 months, with mean age at intervention 6.1 months. Cost per diagnosis was estimated at $5,074. Conclusions: Our current UNHS protocol using sequential ABR has been successful in screening virtually all neonates and providing timely intervention. This retrospective review has shown one HL diagnosis for every 811 babies screened without high-risk factors.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Evidence for Universal Newborn Hearing ScreeningAmerican Journal of Audiology, 2001
- Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: Evaluation of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission, Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission, and Auditory Brain Stem Response Test PerformanceEar & Hearing, 2000
- A cost-effectiveness analysis of newborn hearing screening strategies.Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2000
- Newborn and Infant Hearing Loss: Detection and InterventionPEDIATRICS, 1999
- Unilateral Hearing Loss in ChildrenLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1999
- The Newborn With Hearing Loss: Detection in the NurseryPEDIATRICS, 1998
- Age of Suspicion, Identification, and Intervention for Infants and Young Children with Hearing Loss: A National StudyEar & Hearing, 1996
- Early educational intervention with disadvantaged children—To what effect?Applied and Preventive Psychology, 1992
- The Effectiveness of Screening Programs Based on High-Risk Characteristics in Early Identification of Hearing ImpairmentEar & Hearing, 1991
- Enhancing the Outcomes of Low-Birth-Weight, Premature InfantsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1990